Readit News logoReadit News
gcbirzan commented on Perplexity is using stealth, undeclared crawlers to evade no-crawl directives   blog.cloudflare.com/perpl... · Posted by u/rrampage
rzz3 · 24 days ago
I hope they realize Cloudflare opted them in to blocking LLMs.
gcbirzan · 24 days ago
I hope you realise that lying is bad.
gcbirzan commented on Perplexity is using stealth, undeclared crawlers to evade no-crawl directives   blog.cloudflare.com/perpl... · Posted by u/rrampage
kazinator · 24 days ago
Why single out Perplexity? Pretty much no crawler out there fetches robots.txt.

robots.txt is not a blocking mechanism; it's a hint to indicate which parts of a site might be of interest to indexing.

People started using robots.txt to lie and declare things like no part of their site is interesting, and so of course that gets ignored.

gcbirzan · 24 days ago
That's not true, at all.
gcbirzan commented on Perplexity is using stealth, undeclared crawlers to evade no-crawl directives   blog.cloudflare.com/perpl... · Posted by u/rrampage
tempfile · 24 days ago
Do you ask for consent before you visit a website? If I told you, you personally, to stop visiting my blog, would you stop?
gcbirzan · 24 days ago
I am not told I cannot access. And, yes, I would, because I'd be breaking the law otherwise.
gcbirzan commented on Perplexity is using stealth, undeclared crawlers to evade no-crawl directives   blog.cloudflare.com/perpl... · Posted by u/rrampage
gcbirzan · 24 days ago
Yeah, that's a lie. I didn't do anything and I didn't get opted in.

Edit: And, btw, that statement was true before the default was changed. So, your comment is doubly false.

gcbirzan commented on I'm switching to Python and actually liking it   cesarsotovalero.net/blog/... · Posted by u/cesarsotovalero
JKCalhoun · a month ago
I think the point was: who can know by looking at it.
gcbirzan · a month ago
I mean, maybe you should use a font that doesn't make it hard to figure that out. Next you're gonna say we should ban 0s and Os, Is and ls, because your font doesn't allow you to figure out which one it is.
gcbirzan commented on Enhancing MySQL: MySQL improvement project   github.com/enhancedformys... · Posted by u/bratao
rjh29 · 3 months ago
There should be a blog post to point to people who have a 1990s view of MySQL. It has changed a lot and has most of PostgreSQL's feature set while being faster and simpler to use for the average user.
gcbirzan · 3 months ago
That comment was wrong, yes, but I'm actually curious why you find MySQL faster and simpler to use for the average user.
gcbirzan commented on Gemini 2.5 Flash   developers.googleblog.com... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
menshiki · 4 months ago
As a person mostly using AI for everyday tasks and business-related research, it's very impressive how quickly they've progressed. I would consider all models before 2.0 totally unusable. Their web interface, however, is so much worse than that of the ChatGPT macOS app.
gcbirzan · 4 months ago
Some aren't even at 2.0, and the version numbers aren't related in any way to their... generation? Also, what is so good about the ChatGPT app, specifically on macOS that makes it better?
gcbirzan commented on Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is faster than Redis   hpkv.io... · Posted by u/mehrant
mehrant · 5 months ago
We provide some elements of ACID guarantees, but not full ACID compliance as traditionally defined in database systems:

Atomicity: Yes, for individual operations. Each key-value operation is atomic (it either completes fully or not at all).

Consistency: Partial. We ensure data validity through our conflict resolution strategies, but we don't support multi-key constraints or referential integrity.

Isolation: Limited. Operations on individual keys are isolated, but we don't provide transaction isolation levels across multiple keys.

Durability: Yes. Our persistence model allows for tunable durability guarantees with corresponding performance trade-offs.

So while we provide strong guarantees for individual operations, HPKV is not a full ACID-compliant database system. We've optimized for high-performance key-value operations with practical durability assurances rather than complete ACID semantics.

gcbirzan · 5 months ago
> Consistency: Partial. We ensure data validity through our conflict resolution strategies, but we don't support multi-key constraints or referential integrity.

That's not what consistency means in ACID.

> Durability: Yes. Our persistence model allows for tunable durability guarantees with corresponding performance trade-offs.

> ~600ns p50 for writes with disk persistence

I'm pretty sure there's no durability there. That statement is pretty disingenuous in itself, but it'd be nice to see a number for durability (which, granted, is not something you advertise the product for).

My main concern is that all these speed benefits are going to be eclipsed by the 0.5ms of network latency.

gcbirzan commented on Making any integer with four 2s   eli.thegreenplace.net/202... · Posted by u/LorenDB
pinoy420 · 6 months ago
If floor a legitimate mathematical function?
gcbirzan commented on AWS S3 SDK breaks its compatible services   xuanwo.io/links/2025/02/a... · Posted by u/ulrischa
amazingamazing · 6 months ago
I wish more services would become de-facto standards and there were many implementations of the same API. I'd love more (cheaper) DynamoDB compatible APIs.
gcbirzan · 6 months ago
Why would anyone want a DynamoDB compatible API?

u/gcbirzan

KarmaCake day246March 1, 2012View Original