Readit Newsgadr90 commented on Show HN: One – A new React framework unifying web, native and local-first onestack.dev... · Posted by u/nwienert
> the most transformative step forward since Next.js
I'd consider Next.js a giant step backwards, frankly.
Worse things have been said about them
gadr90 commented on Show HN: One – A new React framework unifying web, native and local-first onestack.dev... · Posted by u/nwienert
gadr90 commented on Show HN: One – A new React framework unifying web, native and local-first onestack.dev... · Posted by u/nwienert
Closed? How? Genuinely want to know more. Don't have much experience with ecosystem.
There are those who would say they created a "bait and switch" from their open framework into their closed for-profit deployment platform. That is not objectively wrong, though. But still, many complain. I say: good for them. Let competition happen.
gadr90 commented on Show HN: One – A new React framework unifying web, native and local-first onestack.dev... · Posted by u/nwienert
This is exactly how my best friends and family would write in my Show HN if I ever post one.
I happen to be from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, so I never met Nate — yet! But I'm pretty sure our paths will cross in the long long road of web development ahead of us :)
gadr90 commented on Show HN: One – A new React framework unifying web, native and local-first onestack.dev... · Posted by u/nwienert
> most transformative step forward since Next.js
Can't help but roll my eyes here
I am a fierce hater of the complexity and closed-ness which Next.js became, BUT "results don't have to be explained" and Mr. Guillermo unarguably executed the hell out of it. It IS the default for new frontend developers, right now. I don't think it will necessarily remain, specially because of things like One!
gadr90 commented on Show HN: One – A new React framework unifying web, native and local-first onestack.dev... · Posted by u/nwienert
What the hell, Nate! As a long-time web developer who witnessed the divide between frontend and backend, this looks like the most transformative step forward since Next.js. What you have built here is amazing, and it's definitely something that the industry needs right now.
Me and my team have been working on a new Web Draw-first IDE that we're going to launch in a few weeks. And I just sent this thread to my engineering team demanding that they swiftly integrate One into our web draw, or they will walk the board! Just kidding. We're not really pirates. Anyway, amazing work, looking forward to using it for many projects here!!!
Deleted Comment
gadr90 commented on Show HN: Deco.cx – realtime TypeScript web editor deco.cx... · Posted by u/lucis
The homepage has terrible performance not a good first impression
Hi Julien! I finally had the time to debug this and turns out it was trivial! We were missing a requestAnimationFrame, d'oh! Thanks for pointing it out, solved here: https://github.com/deco-sites/starting/pull/307
"Does HUMANS represent a dead end?"
"HUMANS should not be used for serious applications."
"HUMANS are unmanageable, and as a consequence their use in serious contexts is irresponsible."
"HUMANS have no internal structure that relates meaningfully to their functionality."
"HUMANS have input and state spaces too large for exhaustive testing."
"HUMANS do not allow verification by parts (unit testing, integration testing, etc)."
"HUMANS have faults, but even their error behaviour is likely emergent, and certainly hard to predict or eradicate."
"HUMANS have no model of knowledge and no representation of any ‘reasoning.’"
"HUMANS represent a dead end, where exponential increases of training data and effort will give us modest increases in impressive plausibility but no foundational increase in reliability."
"HUMANS cannot be developed, or reused, as components."
"There is no possibility for stepwise development — using either informal or formal methods — for HUMANS."
and my favorite:
"In my mind, all this puts even state-of-the-art HUMANS in a position where professional responsibility dictates the avoidance of them in any serious application."