Readit News logoReadit News
furyg3 commented on Data centers in space makes no sense   civai.org/blog/space-data... · Posted by u/ajyoon
furyg3 · 8 days ago
This whole thing is Musk just trying to keep the hype train going. Musk has learned one neat trick from all of his (quite admirable) success with Tesla and SpaceX: hype is more profitable than actually doing stuff that generates value now.

Tesla's valuation has been nuts for a while. The music was going to stop playing at some point, so something something robotaxis, something something androids, something something AI. Keep the investors duped while you can move money around and leverage it to stay relevant.

Cars are out, social media as well (especially X), but Space is still in, and even more so AI. So let's move the cost center with world domination potential (AI) over to the one company that's making money and has a still has a cash-out potential via an IPO.

I'm just so tired of it all. I actually think 'boutique' businesses (companies that generate real value to real users and are profitable now) are the only thing that can save our economy medium-term, but investors and the government are having none of it. And the result is that these bait-and-switch scams will continue.

furyg3 commented on How Y Combinator made it smart to trust founders   elbowgreasegames.substack... · Posted by u/spacemarine1
chinathrow · a month ago
> Commanders, staffs, and subordinates ensure their decisions and actions comply with applicable U.S., international, and, in some cases, host-nation laws and regulations. Commanders at all levels ensure their Soldiers operate in accordance with the Army Ethic, the law of war, and the rules of engagement. (See FM 27-10 for a discussion of the law of war.)

Not sure this was followed very recently.

furyg3 · a month ago
It isn't very complicated from a military law perspective. The chain of command (following orders) has a lot more weight on it than a given solder's interpretation of military, constitutional, or international law.

If you believe you are being a given an order that is illegal and refuse, you are essentially putting your head on the chopping block and hoping that a superior officer (who outranks the one giving you the order) later agrees with you. Recent events have involved the commander in chief issuing the orders directly, which means the 'appealing to a higher authority' exit is closed and barred shut for a solider refusing to follow orders.

That doesn't mean a soldier isn't morally obligated to refuse an unlawful / immoral order, just that they will also have to pay a price for keeping their conscience (maybe a future president will give them a pardon?). The inverse is also true, soliders who knowingly follow certain orders (war crimes) are likely to be punished if their side loses, they are captured, or the future decides their actions were indefensible.

A punishment for ignoring a command like "execute those POWs!" has a good chance of being overruled, but may not be. However an order to invade Canada from the President, even if there will be civilian casualties, must be followed. If the President's bosses (Congress/Judiciary) disagree with that order they have recourse.

Unfortunately the general trend which continues is for Congress to delegate their war making powers to the President without review, and for the Supreme Court to give extraordinary legal leeway when it comes to the legality of Presidential actions.

furyg3 commented on Honey's Dieselgate: Detecting and tricking testers   vptdigital.com/blog/honey... · Posted by u/AkshatJ27
Waterluvian · a month ago
> what the engineers thought when doing design reviews for a "selective stand down" feature.

Possibly a version of, “I lack the freedom to operate with a moral code at work because I’m probably replaceable, the job market makes me anxious, my family’s well-being and healthcare are tied to having a job, and I don’t believe the government has my back.”

furyg3 · a month ago
I like the idea that what makes someone a 'professional' instead of just an employee is the wherewithal, agency, and expectation to say no to a particular task or assignment.

An architect or engineer is expected to signal and object to an unsafe design, and is expected by their profession (peers, clients, future employers) to refuse said work even if it costs them their job. This applies even to professions without a formalized license board.

If you don't have the guts and ability to act ethically (and your field will let you get away with it), you're just a code monkey and not a professional software developer.

furyg3 commented on Roomba maker goes bankrupt, Chinese owner emerges   news.bloomberglaw.com/ban... · Posted by u/nreece
furyg3 · 2 months ago
Are there any good robo-vacuum cleaners that will still clean your floor if the internet is down?

I've had my Miele vacuum cleaner for 15 years now, and I bought it second hand. I can still buy bags and filters for it, and when the floor roller piece broke (something heavy fell on it) I was able to buy a replacement one for cheap. I see no reason why it can't go another 10 years.

It feels like a very low probability that a robo-cleaner I buy now will come from a company that (in 10+ years) will a) exist and b) support 10+ year old vacuum cleaners.

furyg3 commented on Accepting US car standards would risk European lives   etsc.eu/accepting-us-car-... · Posted by u/saubeidl
mrdevlar · 2 months ago
It's a tactic, agree to the deal, the US ignores us. Allow the deal to get destroyed in parliament and the courts and it has no effect. The deal was a means by which to get enough time to figure out the correct response. We've been doing this kind of thing for decades.
furyg3 · 2 months ago
This is the way. The current US administration is a 2 year old with ADHD and shiny distractions abound. Agree to deals and let him claim wins, and then bury it in bureaucracy and common sense.

This is, essentially, how the US government survived Trump 1.0, and is why Trump 2.0 has been so concerned with gutting bureaucracy and placing vapid yes-men in the cabinet, but they can't really do that in Europe.

It's one of the few times where EU bureaucracy is a huge advantage.

furyg3 commented on Michael Burry is back with two bets against Nvidia and Palantir   cnn.com/2025/11/05/busine... · Posted by u/jb1991
guywithahat · 3 months ago
Previous similar posts https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45813734 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45815852

That said I'm not convinced with these famous investors. I worry the big short kind of broke his brain, he's obsessed with these landfall cases now and I'm not sure they're really going to pan out. His last big one was water and I can't imagine he's doing much better than just farmers renting the land he owns.

furyg3 · 3 months ago
I definitely think that he thinks he's smarter than the market and sees bubbles everywhere, and I also definitely think that there's a gigantic AI bubble, or at least extreme 'frothiness' with all this circular investing to prop stock prices up.

Actually turning a bubble into money is another question entirely, however, especially since he himself popularized shouting the emperor has no clothes at every turn. When the market will believe someone is a different story.

furyg3 commented on Nightmare Fuel: Skibidi Toilet and the Monstrous Digital   journal.media-culture.org... · Posted by u/mallowdram
fxwin · 4 months ago
German newspaper "Die Zeit" has a few videos where they get art/cultural critics to watch and comment on modern meme culture which i find quite entertaining. Here is the video about Skibidi Toilet: https://youtu.be/z-oAtxjnDlQ?si=FjpcVJxMoLv537RZ (Audio is mostly german, but the subtitles are quite accurate from what i can tell).

Also recommend this one with "German Brainrot": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mJENuEN_rs

furyg3 · 4 months ago
Wow that's just excellent. German classes paying off already!
furyg3 commented on Dutch government takes control of Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia   cnbc.com/2025/10/13/dutch... · Posted by u/piskov
adrian_b · 4 months ago
The press is full of contradictory information, so it is hard to guess which is the truth.

This information about misdeeds of the CEO looks like a very convenient excuse for the Dutch government, while another article published in the press claims that, according to newly published court proceedings, already at a meeting in June between US officials and Dutch officials USA had requested the removal of the Chinese CEO by the Dutch, as a condition for not enforcing export controls over Nexperia.

https://www.politico.eu/article/us-pressured-the-netherlands...

Both claims could be true, USA has pressured Netherlands to remove the Chinese CEO, then the Dutch have investigated the CEO to find a reason to intervene and they have found this dubious deal where he bought a double amount of wafers compared to the actual needs.

This deal may be abusive, but it looks rather mild in comparison with how most CEOs mishandle the assets of their companies. I doubt that there are many CEOs against whom a thorough investigation would not find such deals. Here at least he got usable semiconductor wafers, but many such deals are for valueless software or consulting.

furyg3 · 4 months ago
I can imagine that there could be a case of parallel construction to build a case to get a specific desired outcome. I also think that if you're right and this is an example of a 'mild' case of mismanaged assets it's still pretty egregious.

I find the even milder circular financing of deals like nVidia investing in OpenAI to be concerning.

furyg3 commented on Why are so many pedestrians killed by cars in the US?   construction-physics.com/... · Posted by u/thelastgallon
furyg3 · 4 months ago
At first I thought maybe the number of pedestrian journeys have gone up, but that appears to be declining (leading to even more concern as to why deaths have gone up).
furyg3 commented on Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at   kix.dev/two-things-llm-co... · Posted by u/kixpanganiban
clayliu · 4 months ago
“They’re still more like weird, overconfident interns.” Perfect summary. LLMs can emit code fast but they don’t really handle code like developers do — there’s no sense of spatial manipulation, no memory of where things live, no questions asked before moving stuff around. Until they can “copy-paste” both code and context with intent, they’ll stay great at producing snippets and terrible at collaborating.
furyg3 · 4 months ago
This is exactly how we describe them internally: the smartest interns in the world. I think it's because the chat box way of interacting with them is also similar to how you would talk to someone who just joined a team.

"Hey it wasn't what you asked me to do but I went ahead and refactored this whole area over here while simultaneously screwing up the business logic because I have no comprehension of how users use the tool". "Um, ok but did you change the way notifications work like I asked". "Yes." "Notifications don't work anymore". "I'll get right on it".

u/furyg3

KarmaCake day4606January 3, 2009
About
Name's Derek, nice to meet you...
View Original