From Wikipedia:
Overexploitation, also called overharvesting or ecological overshoot, refers to harvesting a renewable resource to the point of diminishing returns.[2] Continued overexploitation can lead to the destruction of the resource, as it will be unable to replenish itself. The term applies to various natural resources such as water aquifers, grazing pastures and forests, wild medicinal plants, fish stocks, and other wildlife.
If it gets to the point where the fine is prohibitively expensive, then the system should in fact be prohibited.
I understand the YouTube titles have to be kind of clickbaity but that to me doesn't indicate confidence that I'm going to be reading or watching something worthwhile. Just my two cents.
I'm not saying OP is wrong (I could not tolerate the article enough to finish it) but it's an oddly abrasive way to present a viewpoint.
> ZTE , which already paid some $2 billion in penalties to U.S. authorities over export violations during President Donald Trump's first term, has for years faced probes by authorities around the world, opens new tab into alleged bribes to secure telecom contracts
I suppose the true cost of open and visible bribery is that now everyone wants a piece of the pie.
>we looked at industry standard values and decided to double them just in case.
Edit: I might also add, this is a good example of the difference between consumers and customers.