Work expands to fill available hours. We don’t get more leisure time. That’s not ‘allowed’.
The industrial revolution coincides more or less with when starvation started to disappear from the developed world.
In many countries, holidays and PTO are a norm. I personally know a few people that choose to work 4 days a week, I know another bunch that actually retired early or simply don't jump from a job to another because they can free ride for a bit (no judgment).
That also means that you 1/ have to actually prioritize leisure over money 2/ have actually something leisurely to do.
How is the gdpr vague?
That being said: it is extremely strict, a lot of lawyers like to make it stricter (because for them it means safer) and a lot of lawyers have to back of under business constraint (that push to sometimes got below legal requirements). My experience is that no two companies have the same understanding of GDPR.
- AI that collects “real time” biometric data in public places for the purposes of law enforcement.
- AI that creates — or expands — facial recognition databases by scraping images online or from security cameras.
- AI that uses biometrics to infer a person’s characteristics
- AI that collects “real time” biometric data in public places for the purposes of law enforcement.
All of the above can be achieved with just software, statistics, old ML techniques, i.e. 'non hype' AI kind of software.
I am not familiar with the detail of the EU AI pact but it seems like the article is simplifying important details.
I assume the ban is on the purpose/usage rather than whatever technology is used under the hood, right?
I would really love to see a Q&A thread like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42770125 from someone who's actually read the documents, practices law in the area, and also understands the difference between US and EU law.
https://outofthecomfortzone.frantzmiccoli.com/thoughts/2024/... and here is my shameless plug.
1. NFC is catching on in China (with Alipay), even face scanning for payments.
2. I would not say it is frictionless. Especially for foreigners (and the ~200 USD per day limit...just to name an example).
3. Translate in Alipay is there, but useless in restaurants (Yummy Duck Shit Tea!).
4. No mention of Wechat?
5. 'The rules' very much apply to Alipay and Alibaba, where is Jack Ma ;)
6. This is not 'the web'.
1. True. 2. I never hit that limit. I knew there was one, but that didn't create friction. 3. I think it worked ok-enough in restaurant. You still have a bit of this "surprise" meal indeed. 4. I didn't use it much compared to the other, so I stayed there. 5. Fair. He seems alive and much more measured in his public statements now :) 6. Fair too.