It’s all nonsensical anyway.
It’s all nonsensical anyway.
Seems highly unlikely and also fine. If you want to introduce moral arguments, you can dig your own hole.
Remember: no forgiveness means eviction and bankruptcy, which disqualify you from renting practically anywhere.
the moratorium didn't contribute to owing more, because the alternative was to have those people evicted and in the streets (in the middle of a pandemic no less). unless if they could have gone to a lower-rent shelter had they been evicted, they are going to owe just as much.
A similar situation is that I can listen to music on my phone with Spotify legally but if I plug my phone in to a speaker system and play the music for a large group in public, it’s no longer allowed. But the music actually came from Spotify so how is it different?
Tech people always feel entitled to loopholes in laws like “this file is just a bunch of bits, how can a number be illegal??” But this thinking is not useful for a functional legal system.
You get a mail sometime in the future and after receiving it you have to turn around and download multiple chunks, log in for each of them and do it quickly before they disappear.
Did you know that you can bypass the lockscreen on Linux Mint by plugging in an external monitor?
https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/issues/9123
Did you know that when you use Chromium on an up-to-date Debian stable, it has over 100 unpatched security holes?
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/s...
If you cannot trust Debian - whom can you trust? Any suggestions which distro takes security serious?