Readit News logoReadit News
flipbrad commented on LoGeR – 3D reconstruction from extremely long videos (DeepMind, UC Berkeley)   loger-project.github.io... · Posted by u/helloplanets
Dead_Lemon · 2 days ago
What is the actual objective of this, is it solving an issue or creating a solution to a problem, that is still to be determined? It seems like a lot of energy to replicate a lidar mapping system. It's not like you can expect accurate dimensions from this approximate guess work, excluding the expected hallucinations adding to inaccuracy.
flipbrad · 2 days ago
N00b question from me, perhaps, but how easy is it to mount and run Lidar on aerial drones?
flipbrad commented on ChatGPT Health   openai.com/index/introduc... · Posted by u/saikatsg
flipbrad · 2 months ago
"we built foundational protections (...) including (...) training our models not to retain personal information from user chats"

Can someone please ELI5 - why is this a training issue, rather than basic design? How does one "train" for this?

flipbrad commented on My 2026 Open Social Web Predictions   timothychambers.net/2025/... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
culi · 3 months ago
A poll of gen alpha (aged 12-15) from 2024 asked about job aspirations:

  YouTuber (32%)
  TikTok creator (21%)
  Doctor/nurse (20%)
  Mobile app/video game developer (19%)
  Entrepreneur (17%)
  Artist (16%)
  Sports athlete (15%)
  Professional online streamer (15%)
  Musician (14%)
  Teacher (14%)

flipbrad · 3 months ago
Something so grim should be accompanied by its citation, just so we can check it's not a windup
flipbrad commented on JetBlue flight averts mid-air collision with US Air Force jet   reuters.com/world/america... · Posted by u/divbzero
flipbrad · 3 months ago
This perhaps isn't the lind of lethality the DoD has in mind.
flipbrad commented on Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban   reuters.com/legal/litigat... · Posted by u/chirau
flipbrad · 3 months ago
Hacker News is social media, isn't it?
flipbrad commented on AWS is 10x slower than a dedicated server for the same price [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=Ps3AI... · Posted by u/wolfgangbabad
ElFitz · 3 months ago
> such as the belief that bare-metal means “server room here in the office”

I remember the day I discovered some companies, and not just tech ones (Walmart, UPS, Toyota,…) actually own, operate, and use their own datacenters.

And there companies out there specialized in planning and building datacenters for them.

I mean, it’s kind of obvious. But it made me realize at how small a scale I both thought and operated.

flipbrad · 3 months ago
Check out how Wikipedia and the rest of the wikimedia universe is run.
flipbrad commented on Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year   mahadk.com/posts/slack... · Posted by u/JustSkyfall
xavxav · 6 months ago
I'm surprised GDPR has nothing to say about this. You should have the right to your data, but I suppose that doesn't extend to companies?
flipbrad · 6 months ago
EU Data Act will be more relevant here, but will take a while to roll out.
flipbrad commented on Introducing Stargate UK   openai.com/index/introduc... · Posted by u/wertyk
flipbrad · 6 months ago
Given https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ukusa-agreement-o... , what does sovereignty even mean here?

I also wish we were attracting industries that weren't going to significantly push up electricity consumption on windless days, which will have an outsized effect on electricity prices everyone else pays. At least this says the datacentres will be up north, hopefully not exacerbating transmission issues.

flipbrad commented on Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act   bbc.com/news/articles/cjr... · Posted by u/phlummox
nemomarx · 7 months ago
there's some irony that the EU is set to have a fairly anonymous solution like next year. they could have waited or tried to use similar tech for this, in theory
flipbrad · 7 months ago
This is about the Category 1 duties arriving by 2027, not this year's tranche of rules (such as age gating).
flipbrad commented on Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act   bbc.com/news/articles/cjr... · Posted by u/phlummox
exasperaited · 7 months ago
But this is how the law works? Even in the USA, the Supreme Court doesn't act on hypotheticals. They wait until someone brings an actual case.

Ofcom haven't ruled Wikipedia is Category 1. They haven't announced the intention to rule it Category 1. The Category 1 rules are not yet in effect and aren't even finalised. They aren't pointing any gun.

Wikipedia have a case that they shouldn't be Category 1 if that happens. But they went fishing in advance (or to use an alternative metaphor, they got out over their skis).

What else is the court to do but give a reassurance that the process will absolutely be amenable to review if the hypothetical circumstance comes to pass? That is what the section you are quoted says.

First, it's a statutory instrument that ministers will amend if it has unintended, severe consequences.

Second, the rules in question have not been written yet and they are being written in conjunction with industry (which will include Wikipedia). Because Ofcom is an industry self-regulation body.

flipbrad · 7 months ago
A lot of what you are posting is not true. Take for instance your claim that "Ofcom is an industry self-regulation body"

u/flipbrad

KarmaCake day1834April 12, 2008View Original