Readit News logoReadit News
etrevino commented on The $500M Dollar Typo   cockroachlabs.com/blog/tr... · Posted by u/makaimc
sokoloff · 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure that the agreement I signed to enable direct deposit allowed for errors and overpayments to be removed from my account.
etrevino · 2 years ago
This was 20 years ago and a lot of people were paid by check. So the only way to reclaim the money from them was to underpay folks. They probably just handled it that way for everyone.

Even now, at my Federal government job when someone is overpaid we issue them a "debt letter" and then reduce their pay until the account is balanced. I assume it's because of the same reg/statute that fixes the clawback to 16.7%.

etrevino commented on Who lusts for certainty lusts for lies   etymonline.com/columns/po... · Posted by u/hprotagonist
fenomas · 2 years ago
Sorry, HN previously had TFA's actual title - "Who Lusts for Certainty Lusts for Lies".
etrevino · 2 years ago
lol, that's pretty good, I agree with you.
etrevino commented on Who lusts for certainty lusts for lies   etymonline.com/columns/po... · Posted by u/hprotagonist
fenomas · 2 years ago
And boo, incidentally, to whomever changed the HN title - from the most memorably evocative title this site has ever seen to one of the blandest.
etrevino · 2 years ago
What was it? I arrived too late.
etrevino commented on What character was removed from the alphabet? (2020)   dictionary.com/e/ampersan... · Posted by u/paulkrush
smeej · 3 years ago
Wait, here I've been thinking the alphabet has 26 letters all this time?

(double checks keyboard)

etrevino · 3 years ago
You're right
etrevino commented on Python GUIs   pythonguis.com... · Posted by u/gilad
at_a_remove · 3 years ago
I used wxPython many, many years ago on a foolish project. I am sure it has matured.

But as always, I turn to PEP 20, in particular "There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it." Batteries ought to be included. I'm hardly a language designer, but more and more I care less about things like syntax and such, and more about having as much as possible already built out, so I can focus on the particulars of a problem, rather than having to endure a "evaluate a bunch of alternatives" phase for each little thing.

It's a tall order, and a growing one, but I think whatever the next big language is, it will have that kind of focus.

etrevino · 3 years ago
Maybe I misunderstand you, but there is Tkinter if you want a GUI included with Python.
etrevino commented on January 1, 2023 is Public Domain Day: Works from 1927 are open to all   web.law.duke.edu/cspd/pub... · Posted by u/CharlesW
__MatrixMan__ · 3 years ago
From that history of copyright page:

> The origin of copyright law in most European countries lies in efforts by the church and governments to regulate and control the output of printers

I think it's far more likely that they're about making sure that the wrong sort of bible, or the wrong sort of pamphlet, doesn't get printed. Whatever "for the economy" or "for the creators" verbiage is in there was added after the fact by marketing.

etrevino · 3 years ago
The Wiki article is something I wish I had time to edit. Yes, there was an attempt to ensure that the right sort of thing be printed, but it was also about making sure that no one else could print certain documents. You'd license a bible text to be able to regulate that it's the correct type of bible being printed, yes. You'd then see who else was printing bibles and shut them down. Okay, that's all correct, but there's more to its foundation than that. For example, in the UK, one individual had the sole right to profit off the last testaments of people to be hanged in Newgate Prison. In the 17th C, Parliament gave this power was to a preacher who in turn designated a specific printer. That power is what allowed the preacher (and the printer) to profit: no one could (legally) copy it. Regulating printers was the only way to ensure profit for an author and it was an attempt to guarantee conformity.
etrevino commented on Stanford's “Elimination of Harmful Language” Initiative   itcommunity.stanford.edu/... · Posted by u/ryzvonusef
eclipxe · 3 years ago
Really really bad take. Really bad.
etrevino · 3 years ago
Can you explain why it's bad?
etrevino commented on Female spies of MI6   ft.com/content/741772c0-e... · Posted by u/bookofjoe
bpye · 3 years ago
> Not everyone is motivated by money.

Sure but if you take a student loan in the U.K. starting pay in the civil service wouldn’t even put you above the repayment threshold. I get that there are levels, but unless you have support or a partner the starting pay really isn’t enough especially if you’re in London. Cheltenham or Manchester - maybe.

etrevino · 3 years ago
That's fair, but this is why the "targeted at Oxbridge kids" thing is so important. Sure, some are paying with loans, but most don't need them.

Really, this isn't about targeting a specific level of education, it's about targeting a specific class.

etrevino commented on Female spies of MI6   ft.com/content/741772c0-e... · Posted by u/bookofjoe
bpye · 3 years ago
> The article is a recruiting piece targeting well-educated females; but the same (Oxbridge) females can earn six digits in finance and stay safe, instead of earning 22k and getting shot in Kandahar or stabbed in Najaf. One wonders if that combination of compensation and dangerous job spec attracts reckless or idealists personalities.

I always found that the pay scale for the security services is the same as the rest of the civil service really hard to justify. Why would I go work at GCHQ if I could make many multiples more, as a starting salary, in the private sector?

etrevino · 3 years ago
Not everyone is motivated by money. And if these are Oxbridge kids they may not need the cash anyway.

u/etrevino

KarmaCake day1702October 9, 2013View Original