Today, that doesn’t save binaries not distributed through the store or ones you compiled yourself via other compiler chains.
It is possible to change that. One could even imagine it as part of the loading procedure.
Today, that doesn’t save binaries not distributed through the store or ones you compiled yourself via other compiler chains.
It is possible to change that. One could even imagine it as part of the loading procedure.
We're also all able to talk freely about what aspects of our jobs and employers we like and don't like. This is valuable information - for instance, I've heard enough first person anecdotes from various teams to know that I'm not interested in working for Amazon unless all other avenues to pay my mortgage have failed.
The Apple experience sounds like my interview with the NSA years ago. All of my attempts to ask any questions were met with a "no comment" for the most part. Very frustrating experience. I walked away with not much more idea of what a job there would be like than you could get from reading Wikipedia.
Very true but it is interesting that Apple is often used as an example to follow on avoiding a monoculture. In the business press anyway.
https://www.torbenrick.eu/blog/strategy/avoid-an-organizatio...
Honestly, the reality is most engineering is tedious and boring and mired in context. The old 10% inspiration 90% perspiration quote always rung true for me. I think you’ll struggle to have anything other than a superficial conversation of any hard problem or question with any engineer whose not closely associated with your team.
[1] Examples abound but this is my favorite: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37638098-creative-select...
Yes, it can be abused, but it’s kinda like copyright. It’s just like parents having a limited term: it (in theory) catches everyone up to best of X years ago.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/37638098-creative-select...
Personally I'd rather spend my time at a company that allows for some discussion.
... to people outside of Apple. Apple has 137,000 employees in 25 countries. I’m sure you’ll find someone to discuss your work with.
It's not about building a product (i.e. writing code or designing/manufacturing physical stuff), it's about making a list of all the reasons your idea won't work and then subtracting them all as cheaply and quickly as possible.
This is definitely something I wish I could back and beat into 20-year old me. It would have saved me so much time and effort between then and now.
What drove a sense of inferiority for me was somebody getting better grades with seemingly less effort.
Do you think it's so unfair that 90% of students would feel the same way? It's not impossible but personally, I would be surprised by that. Which is the point. Experiences vary dramatically, especially if we broaden the statement internationally, so knowing who was asked what is just as important as the claim.
At the extreme, imagine if every person has a unique identifier that was automatically sent whenever they used any device: preventing ad fraud would be really easy, and you would have essentially zero privacy. At the other extreme, imagine if every device looked exactly the same, with no user agent, no IP, no cookies, no way to tell my traffic from yours. In that situation, people would have pretty strong privacy, but if you had headless browsers loading the ads on your site no one would be able to tell that those views were not from real users.
As the GGP says, removing IDFA shifts the balance toward both privacy and fraud. See https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-supports-privacy-pass... and https://web.dev/trust-tokens/ for attempts to separate these.
(Disclosure: I work on ads at Google, speaking only for myself.)
Honest question, I am not trying to be obtuse, but in this context can you more specifically define fraud? Is it just "ad fraud" as defined here: https://www.clickcease.com/blog/what-is-ad-fraud/
I get why businesses should care about ad fraud, but why should I, as a consumer care about it? Frankly I don't even want to know about my traffic, let alone yours.
Does anyone know which study this came from? I was trying to figure out exactly how the survey question was worded because this statistic seems somewhat amazing to me. The driving one I get because drivers are not being routinely graded, but students are.
I googled the phrase and I basically got related quotes, this article (from 2010), and a couple of studies that came after this article was posted, and they were mostly looking at gender differences in preceived intelligence and after a quick glance, didn't seem to support this statement.
[1] https://science.howstuffworks.com/nature/climate-weather/atm...