Words don't represent thoughts in any way shape or form. They externalize bias as a pretext to communication, which is arbitary. Every word is a metaphor, every word is mythological. These are empirical facts developed from Aristotle, Cassirer, Halliday into Fedorenko, yet CS takes not note of it. Language has no form that refers or represents anything in reality in any sense of concatenation. They are gibberish. This is where humanity is off the rails. Word statements are only 'about' status, dominance, control. Statements in arbitrary words do not exist as references or representations. A statement like which person makes more accurate predictions is basically nonsense, it's applying arbitrary values to events subjectively. Once we understand prediction has nothing to do with how brains work, it's basically an animal that has no relationship to others or itself except as to extract value and control. The argument is simply over your head unless you grasp the fundamentals: words do not work. Please don't pretend others don't grasp these ideas, brilliant minds have been dissecting the illusions of words since Aristotle. "Marshall McLuhan's idea of the "schizophrenic alphabet" is a provocative metaphor for his theory that the phonetic alphabet fundamentally altered human consciousness, leading to a fragmented, detached, and individualistic psychology."
So you are saying that your words are arbitrary and meaningless? You are writing gibberish because you have no choice?
Also, an increasing percentage of men, especially younger ones, are becoming more and more conservative, whereas women become more liberal. The massive political divide vs. women is strong enough to prevent even friendly relationships across political beliefs.
Testosterone creates tension and a commanding attitude. Men naturally don't want to marry a feminist. Men want to marry a feminine woman, not a woman acting like a man. Women are literally a multi-faceted stress-ball for men: breasts, butt, etc are soothing to men. Downvote this comment if you want, blame some nonspecific "gender bias". It's nature; we're wired this way at the DNA level.
On a similar note, women weaponizing sex against men by initially advertising their assets, then withholding them unless they can control their men... it doesn't work in real relationships.
Then there's the race issue. Where I might get the most pushback: marrying someone from a significantly different culture is difficult. Might work for some, but a Southern American marrying a central-American immigrant is unlikely to work out in the long-term. Might be romantic and interesting, but culture is just so different. This is why diversity is not always a strength.
Women and men both want the former.
> women weaponizing sex against men by initially advertising their assets, then withholding them unless they can control their men
You need to spend more time with women who are emotionally mature. What you describe is childish behavior.
Keep in mind emotionally mature people will have less tolerance for bullshit or anti-social behavior.