Readit News logoReadit News
dunbr commented on U.S. cancer death rate has dropped by a third since 1991   wsj.com/articles/u-s-canc... · Posted by u/impish9208
kodah · 3 years ago
Prostate cancer is one that men should be especially familiar with. My dad was diagnosed years ago after his PCP ignored escalating PSA levels. Although he's a "survivor" of Stage 4 his life is a shell of what it was, and has expressed a number of times he wishes he was dead. When I spoke to the oncologist after his diagnosis I remember this adage specifically: "If you did an autopsy on every man that dies over 40, you'd find the beginnings of prostate cancer in all of them. It's a question of when, not if."

I say this to highlight three things:

- Physicians routinely ignore things they shouldn't. Be your own advocate and research the things your doctor tells you, especially the things they believe are just worth watching.

- There is little to no awareness in the public over prostate cancer.

- Surviving isn't always a good metric. In my dad's case, surviving was a promise for a slow and miserable death.

dunbr · 3 years ago
I work in this field and directly am involved with the treatment of prostate cancers. What you describe is not standard of care, and I’d hesitate to say that everyone should be so alarmed of getting prostate or any cancer. It’s unfortunate that your father’s PCP wasn’t aware of such warning signs, and I’m sorry for your loss.

However, We’ve seen this before with prostate and breast cancer where early and often screening leads to not only false positives but undue stress on patients. Furthermore, catching a nonaggressive prostate cancer 2-5 years early may lead to the same outcomes as catching it when certain things like PSA are detected to be increasing. But you may drastically affect one’s quality of life. It can at times be a difficult balance.

We see more and more elderly patients being treated because they are living longer. For many though, “waitful watching” or “active surveillance” is the correct clinical decision and always is up to the patient.

Finally, while prostate cancer isn’t as publicized as breast cancer (we’re trying!). It is a well known cancer and there is awareness of it.

dunbr commented on Experimental blood test detects cancer up to four years before symptoms appear   scientificamerican.com/ar... · Posted by u/prawn
thaumasiotes · 6 years ago
He got radiation treatment (for prostate!) at 67? That's very odd -- radiation treatment is not recommended for a patient who would be expected to live for more than 10 years in the absence of the cancer.
dunbr · 6 years ago
While there other treatment options. Radiation therapy is a very common treatment to patients of all ages and isn’t odd at all.
dunbr commented on Experimental blood test detects cancer up to four years before symptoms appear   scientificamerican.com/ar... · Posted by u/prawn
abalone · 6 years ago
> Ignoring prostate cancer is in fact a common way to handle it... The technical term for this is "watchful waiting".

That is not watchful waiting. There is a lot of active watching in watchful waiting, not ignoring. For example you may get looked at every 3 months, either a blood test or an TRUS ultrasound, plus a biopsy every couple years. If it gets worse and crosses a threshold, you might get treated.

This is entirely different from just ignoring it. There are many different grades of prostate cancer and the key is detecting the aggressive types before they metastasize.

dunbr · 6 years ago
Just to clarify what you are describing is called “active surveillance” and is a step up compared to “watchful watching”. Both are ways to deal with prostate cancers.

It depends on risk, diagnosis, and age, but generally with active surveillance you will be actively monitored, you’ll monitor PSA volumes and prostate sizes (and get biopsies), usually on a regular basis. Watchful waiting is much less invasive. When someone is old, their cancer not aggressive and low risk, and is dealing with other health issues, subjecting them to numerous tests for no real benefit is a big stress to both them and their families.

dunbr commented on ‘Salt, Fat, Acid, Heat’ Is a Love Letter to Amateur Cooks   theatlantic.com/entertain... · Posted by u/tomhoward
ktta · 7 years ago
Might not be a "classic", but in my opinion, The Food Lab is one of those 'if you only own one' book. Though it might seem like it is for home cooks who aren't just beginning.

I remember you talking about serious eats somewhere so I'm interested why you didn't include this.

dunbr · 7 years ago
I’d definitely include the food lab in such a list but I think it likely resonates with the tech/science crowd a bit more than say the general public. Kenji is really thorough and at times scientific in his explanations. I could see it being off putting to someone who just wants to know what works or doesn’t.

In a similar case of you recalling him mentioning the food lab, I believe it was his mentioning of the podcast “Cooking Issues” that made me a subscriber.

u/dunbr

KarmaCake day9October 28, 2018View Original