Readit News logoReadit News
drewbug commented on Google will allow only apps from verified developers to be installed on Android   9to5google.com/2025/08/25... · Posted by u/kotaKat
pona-a · 15 hours ago
Maybe a good compromise is to change the boot screen to have a label that the phone is running an unofficial ROM, just like it shows one for unlocked bootloaders? If the system can update that dynamically based on unlock state, why can't it do it based on public keys? Might also discourage vendors/ROM devs from using test keys like Fairphone once did.
drewbug · 15 hours ago
Pixels with, for example, GrapheneOS already do exactly that:

"Your device is loading a different operating system."

drewbug commented on Ask HN: What are your eye fatigue symptoms? What has worked to heal your eyes?    · Posted by u/jMyles
jMyles · 21 days ago
I've seen two doctors who took a look at my eyes and said everything's healthy, and that I'm just experiencing age-related presbyopia (I'm 43m).

My symptoms are as follows:

* My eyes become dry very quickly if they are open at a normal width.

* Due to the above, I spend much of the day with my eyes in a fairly squinted configuration.

* I cannot read, eg, text on my phone without squinting.

* Covering one eye (particularly my left eye) seems to improve my vision.

* My eyes often hurt / burn, especially in the evening.

* I have gnarly floaters in my left eye.

* Reading glasses are not much help; in order to benefit from them, I need to open my eyes more, which makes them very dry within 60 seconds.

* My eyes are often red and cloudy, especially in the morning.

* I occasionally wake up during the night from pain / dryness in my eyes.

* Unlike what I understand is typical for presbyopia, my vision does not degrade throughout the day, and is often a bit better at night.

Observations about things that have changed this:

* Sub-freezing temps seem to bring about a fairly fast (ie, within 1-2 days) and dramatic relief. Each year for the past few, I've gone to Colorado in mid-Feb for three weeks or so, and these are the best vision weeks of the year. However, I spend much of my time in Florida, so I rarely encounter cold temps.

* The drops that the doctor puts in to dilate pupils seem to trigger dramatic improvement, lasting 1-2 days.

* Spending time outside and using an RLCD monitor in the sun does seem to bring about some pain relief, but even multiple days in a row of this don't seem to improve my up-close vision or eye dryness.

I've tried searching every term I can think of, and as I say, I've seen multiple doctors (though I'm happy to go again). If anybody has any insight, I'd really value it. I'm struggling with this.

drewbug · 21 days ago
I had very similar symptoms and it turned out to be slow-onset allergic reactions. Dust mites breed like crazy here in Florida, yet are nearly absent in Colorado...
drewbug commented on Samsung embeds IronSource spyware app on phones across WANA   smex.org/open-letter-to-s... · Posted by u/the-anarchist
kragen · 2 months ago
The truth is far outside the Overton window.

Yes, privacy is a question of civil defense in the drone age. But the existing crop of states will never acknowledge that; their structure and institutions presume precisely the kind of mass databases of PII that create this vulnerability, as well as institutional transparency for public accountability. This makes them structurally vulnerable to insurgencies that expropriate those databases for targeting. The existing states will continue to clutch at their fantasies of adequately secured taxpayer databases until their territorial control (itself an anachronism in the drone age; boots on the ground can no longer provide security against things like Operation Spiderweb) has been reduced to a few fortified clandestine facilities.

Things are going to be very unpredictable and, I suspect, extremely violent.

drewbug · 2 months ago
I used to feel this way until I learned about counter-UAS tech.
drewbug commented on Amelia Earhart's Reckless Final Flights   newyorker.com/magazine/20... · Posted by u/Thevet
wat10000 · 3 months ago
He had been to the Philippines before, coming from the other way.
drewbug · 3 months ago
Wow, I never realized he had sailed to the same longitude before heading West!

Apparently he made it as far Ambon Island in Indonesia, so he indeed circled the globe in nine years starting and ending in the East Indies.

drewbug commented on Cloudlflare builds OAuth with Claude and publishes all the prompts   github.com/cloudflare/wor... · Posted by u/gregorywegory
Invictus0 · 3 months ago
John Rockefeller didn't sit down in a big chair, twirl his mustache, and invent AI to funnel money to the hands of the wealthy. This technology was created by researchers and has been mostly accessible to everyone for as long as it has been around.

All technology has the effect of concentrating wealth, and anyone who insists on using their two hands to fashion things when machines exist that can do it better will always be relegated to the "artisan" bin as time rolls on.

drewbug · 3 months ago
> All technology has the effect of concentrating wealth

Even GNU/Linux? :)

drewbug commented on Ask HN: Is there a "YouTube" for AI coded web apps?    · Posted by u/amichail
drewbug · 3 months ago
Yes, https://websim.com is exactly that.
drewbug commented on GOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill   arstechnica.com/ai/2025/0... · Posted by u/Jtsummers
tdb7893 · 3 months ago
Huh, it never got tested in the Confederacy but it's interesting their Constitution might not have protected it. I'm very curious what the Confederate Supreme Court would have said if it ever had existed.

I wonder if that it's not clearly protected based on US jurisprudence is an oversight because apparently the Barron v Baltimore decision wasn't well known at the time according to the wiki article you linked on it and the VP was so adamant that it is.

drewbug · 3 months ago
It was a major topic of discussion at the Confederate States Constitutional Convention; the fire-eaters lost: https://dn720307.ca.archive.org/0/items/journalofcongres00co...

> In thus constructing the fundamental law, of course, a struggle has occurred in the secret sessions of the Montgomery Congress, in which those refusing to close the door against the reception of anti-slavery States have achieved a victory.

https://www.cw-chronicles.com/blog/admission-of-northern-sta...

drewbug commented on GOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill   arstechnica.com/ai/2025/0... · Posted by u/Jtsummers
tdb7893 · 3 months ago
There are some differences between the Constitutions and I'm not convinced, partially because the vice president of the Confederacy himself seemed to think that it was "unmistakably" protected in the Constitution:

"I congratulate the country that the strife has been put to rest forever, and that American slavery is to stand before the world as it is, and on its own merits. We have now placed our domestic institution, and secured its rights unmistakably, in the Constitution. We have sought by no euphony to hide its name. We have called our negroes 'slaves', and we have recognized and protected them as persons and our rights to them as property."

Edit: The privileges and immunities clause of the US 14th amendment seems to have a parallel in the Confederate Constitution so it's not entirely clear that the Constitutions are the same here (and it seems like if the Constitution didn't protect slavery it was an oversight or someone just forgot to tell their vice president). Apparently the privileges and immunities clause in the US Constitution was essentially nullified later (the US Supreme Court seems to have just wacky interpretations sometimes) but seems intended to confer rights to people in states. I'm a bit out of my depth in finding primary sources on this though, except for the excerpt from the VP who has a very clear opinion (and I have a tendency to not immediately believe what a VP is saying).

Article IV Section 2(1)

The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired.

drewbug · 3 months ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Confederat... clarifies a lot:

> The U.S. Constitution states in Article IV, Section 2, "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." The Confederate Constitution added that a state government could not prohibit the rights of slave owners traveling or visiting from a different state with their slaves.

Similar to the Fugitive Slave Clause, this does not invalidate the Dred Scott opinion that "a State may unquestionably prohibit slavery within its territory."

drewbug commented on GOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill   arstechnica.com/ai/2025/0... · Posted by u/Jtsummers
tdb7893 · 3 months ago
Maybe I'm wrong but I always interpreted that line as they couldn't pass any laws denying slavery, which would include the states. Lots of the clauses in that article are fairly broad rights that wouldn't make sense if it just restricted the federal government (e.g. the ability to bear arms, the right to not quarter soldiers, the right to reasonable bail) so viewing it as a fundamental restriction, and not just a restriction for Congress, isn't a crazy interpretation (though I'm not a constitutional scholar so I don't know).

Their Constitution also had a clause about how new territories needed to allow slavery so choice definitely wasn't their priority:

Article IV Section 3(3)

The Confederate States may acquire new territory; and Congress shall have power to legislate and provide governments for the inhabitants of all territory belonging to the Confederate States, lying without the limits of the several states; and may permit them, at such times, and in such manner as it may by law provide, to form states to be admitted into the Confederacy. In all such territory, the institution of negro slavery as it now exists in the Confederate States, shall be recognized and protected by Congress, and by the territorial government: and the inhabitants of the several Confederate States and Territories, shall have the right to take to such territory any slaves lawfully held by them in any of the states or territories of the Confederate states.

drewbug commented on GOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill   arstechnica.com/ai/2025/0... · Posted by u/Jtsummers
tdb7893 · 3 months ago
I think it's good to realize that many people's commitment to "American" values is weak at best. Things like state's rights, equal representation in government, and even "freedom of speech" are often political tools rather than actual values.

Reading basic history shows it's always been this way. As a simple historical example the soon to be Confederate states complained about "state's rights" for slavery but when they seceded they enshrined slavery in their constitution and notably didn't leave it up to their states (so clearly that institution was more important to them than state autonomy). It's always been a convenient veneer over policy.

drewbug · 3 months ago
Very interesting, but are you sure about that example?

Const. of C.S.A. art. I, § 9, ¶ 4 restricted their federal legislature's power:

> No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.

The next section similarly restricted the states' power to "pass any bill of attainder, or ex post facto law" but did not reference slavery.

u/drewbug

KarmaCake day229November 8, 2013
About
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/drewbug; my proof: https://keybase.io/drewbug/sigs/0FB8Ea2PUdk2jhHfuqvBJqUR7l-HZ6LXurv1mGJtxMI ]
View Original