Readit News logoReadit News
dpwm commented on WireGuard vanity keygen   github.com/axllent/wiregu... · Posted by u/simonpure
yjftsjthsd-h · 10 months ago
> the creation timestamp which is a 32 bit Unix epoch value.

GPG keys aren't 2038-safe?

dpwm · 10 months ago
It's a 32-bit unsigned integer, so that should give us until Feb 2106.

> A time field is an unsigned 4-octet number containing the number of seconds elapsed since midnight, 1 January 1970 UTC.

dpwm commented on AI Advent of Code: Implementing Papers   leetarxiv.com/... · Posted by u/muragekibicho
sva_ · a year ago
The signup sends me to a substack which sends me back to the page in a circle.
dpwm · a year ago
There don’t seem to be any challenges there yet, and the page states it doesn’t begin until December 9th.
dpwm commented on PEP 760: No more bare excepts   discuss.python.org/t/pep-... · Posted by u/ayhanfuat
hyperion2010 · a year ago
I'll add a 4th rationale: 4. It will create work for countless developers which is completely consistent with the python core value of disdain for other people's time.

If this pep were implemented I suspect it would result in forcing thousands of not tens of thousands of people to spend hours modifying perfectly working code and destroying the ability to run old scientific code without modification. Extremely effective industrial sabotage if it were to be accepted.

It is hard for me to articulate how much peps like this reinforce my desire to never start another python project. Even if this pep is rejected the fact that there are people who would put in the time and effort to write and submit such a PEP tells me that they will do it again, and eventually they might succeed.

dpwm · a year ago
From the PEP:

> A tool will be provided to automatically update code to replace bare except: with except BaseException:.

dpwm commented on Common mistakes when using the metric system   nayuki.io/page/common-mis... · Posted by u/stereoabuse
eNV25 · 2 years ago
A IB Diploma Physics textbook I had used a negative one exponent instead of a division symbol in units. This is not normal right?
dpwm · 2 years ago
Yeah that's the normal way in physics in my experience, certainly from undergrad level up.
dpwm commented on My daughter (7 years old) used HTML to make a website   naya.lol... · Posted by u/fintler
jchw · 2 years ago
Flexbox, grid. You're all forgetting the best way to build layouts: ol' reliable, <table>.
dpwm · 2 years ago
As used on HN. It just works, even today.
dpwm commented on For advertising, Firefox now collects user data by default   heise.de/en/news/For-adve... · Posted by u/firebaze
dpwm · 2 years ago
The article links to Mozilla’s press release / blog entry about the acquisition of Anonym [0]. It’s pretty dystopian reading. The last three paragraphs and the summary of Anonym are more worrying than anything else I’ve read on this so far:

> This acquisition marks a significant step in addressing the urgent need for privacy-preserving advertising solutions. By combining Mozilla’s scale and trusted reputation with Anonym’s cutting-edge technology, we can enhance user privacy and advertising effectiveness, leveling the playing field for all stakeholders.

I can only interpret this as the urgent need is money, and wants to sell its "scale and trusted reputation". Mozilla has been down this road before. It was not good for them.

> Anonym was founded with two core beliefs: First, that people have a fundamental right to privacy in online interactions and second, that digital advertising is critical for the sustainability of free content, services and experiences. Mozilla and Anonym share the belief that advanced technologies can enable relevant and measurable advertising while still preserving user privacy.

This is some pretty weak wording for a press release. The economics of the situation are that advertising will always trump privacy. Researchers have successfully de-anonymized anonymised data sets, including medical records. Why would these data be any different?

> As we integrate Anonym into the Mozilla family, we are excited about the possibilities this partnership brings. While Anonym will continue to serve its customer base, together, we are poised to lead the industry toward a future where privacy and effective advertising go hand in hand, supporting a free and open internet.

Anonym’s customers are advertisers, right? The same people who for decades poured money into eroding that free and open internet that we had…

> About Anonym: Anonym was founded in 2022 by former Meta executives Brad Smallwood and Graham Mudd. The company was backed by Griffin Gaming Partners, Norwest Venture Partners, Heracles Capital as well as a number of strategic individual investors.

Well, it seems Anonym, Smallwood and Mudd had a nice piece about them written in the Wall Street Journal [1]. From the second paragraph:

> Graham Mudd and Brad Smallwood each spent more than a decade building Meta’s advertising system, which allowed the company to offer granular data about how ad campaigns worked with individual users, often by tracking their web and mobile activity.

[0] https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-anonym-raising-t...

[1] https://archive.is/17c0f#selection-5751.0-5751.246

dpwm commented on Post Office scandal victims in Scotland have convictions quashed   computerweekly.com/news/3... · Posted by u/taubek
JusticeJuice · 2 years ago
A lot of people who aren't software developers have blind faith that software is always correct. Inversely, software developers never trust software to be correct.
dpwm · 2 years ago
In England and Wales, at least, there’s even a legal principle that information produced by software is correct unless it is proven otherwise. [0]

[0] https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/32105/

dpwm commented on How Much Water Is in Earth's Crust?   worldatlas.com/geology/ho... · Posted by u/Brajeshwar
arghIan · 2 years ago
but how many cups is it?
dpwm · 2 years ago
About 1.8e20 US cups according to Google.
dpwm commented on How Much Water Is in Earth's Crust?   worldatlas.com/geology/ho... · Posted by u/Brajeshwar
dang · 2 years ago
[stub for offtopicness]
dpwm · 2 years ago
Well, that's the first time I've seen cubic miles used as a unit. For reference it's about 4.4e19 litres or 4.4e16 cubic metres.

Deleted Comment

u/dpwm

KarmaCake day2320February 18, 2012View Original