No gross mis-allocation of resources or moral hazards as far as one eyes can see… surely the companies will use these funds much better this time for capex… lol
No gross mis-allocation of resources or moral hazards as far as one eyes can see… surely the companies will use these funds much better this time for capex… lol
Also helps when FRBNY in conjunction with the Tresury dept via state street and blackrock is buying their HY bonds (TMUS US87264AAT25 [Ba3], S US85207UAK16 [B1], CTL US156700BC99 [Ba3], LVLT US527298BF96 [Ba3], VOD US92857WBQ24 [Ba1] for just a few examples, all trading way over par) on you, the taxpayers behalf, on leverage, in the secondary market and thus helping to lower their ongoing borrowing costs.
What perplexing is to think about how humans can cooperate effectively on a scale of billion people to solve humanity biggest problems.
As we can see, empathy for humans outside of the tribe is limited and so different gangs fight each other, let alone different countries.
Maybe we can think about techniques to create empathy among strangers.
In the image labelled "Illustration of the model’s deep learning framework architecture", the input face has a strange line drawn underneath the chin. It seems like an odd thing for a human drawer to put in, and makes the person look like they have a double chin.
Yet in the output shown at the end of the pipeline, it appears as a shadow. I didn't go into the article suspicious, but this immediately made me wonder if for some of these sketches, a face to line drawing network was used for some sort of reverse process.
The image does appear in a part of the article discussing their learning methods, though, so I'm probably missing something important. But given that they "are working to release their code" it doesn't really help with confidence.
They claimed that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine both caused more deaths. The study claimed a huge effect size (~20% increase in death rate) and a giant sample (14888 treated, 81144 control across 671 hospitals). Despite not being a proper blinded trial, this still appeared to be strong evidence and sufficient to stop any reasonable doctor who heard of this study from giving these drugs to patients. If the evidence was fabricated, that’s a big deal.
Deleted Comment
If shareholders want to pay their CEO more directly from their pockets in the form of dilution, it doesn't hurt or affect the standard employee in any way.
GAAP requires companies to report stock compensation as an expense because it does actually move wealth around in a zero-sum fashion. It’s not a magic free money tree.
As someone with Visual Snow Syndrome (not contracted from drugs) it is a private living hell that risking it is not worth whatever trade off you get from discovering yourself. This is going to rub some people the wrong way on HN, but until we know more about these neurological conditions, I wouldn't recommend doing these drugs outside of a clinical setting where there are very clear benefits.