Readit News logoReadit News
dimator commented on AOL to discontinue dial-up internet   nytimes.com/2025/08/11/bu... · Posted by u/situationista
chasd00 · 17 days ago
> hard to overstate how omnipresent the AOL brand was

you could find AOL cds and floppies on the side of the road. They were everywhere.

dimator · 17 days ago
Magazines had their CDs tucked inside, sometimes 2 of them! What a time.
dimator commented on A message from Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to all company employees   newsroom.intel.com/corpor... · Posted by u/rntn
sugarpimpdorsey · 20 days ago
Well that was a whole lot of words that conveyed basically no information.

A sort of corporate communications-whitewashed version of the My Cousin Vinny "Everything that guy just said is bullshit. Thank you."

dimator · 20 days ago
I think the unsaid words were most important: no, I'm not gonna resign because some out of touch conman thinks I should.
dimator commented on ‘I witnessed war crimes’ in Gaza – former worker at GHF aid site [video]   bbc.com/news/videos/cy8k8... · Posted by u/nathanyz
crystal_revenge · a month ago
As someone who went to US high school in the 90s, a good 1/3 of our curriculum seemed to be "never again" studies of the holocaust and other genocides throughout history. Which makes it completely incomprehensible to me that suddenly "don't talk about genocide" has become the basically law.

What's worse is I actually feel openly saying "I don't support this genocide and I'm critical of the state committing it" is a risky thing to say in public. I wouldn't say it not behind a pseudonymous account without some level of plausible deniability. Even peak cancel culture wasn't quite so chilling.

It's also the area with the most clear manipulation of information on social media. The downvotes and flagged comments in this post are clearly not "organic", and the same pattern can be seen all over the web.

We've truly entered a dystopian age that seems completely unfamiliar from the exciting world of tech I wanted to be a part of decades ago.

dimator · a month ago
> It's also the area with the most clear manipulation of information on social media. The downvotes and flagged comments in this post are clearly not "organic", and the same pattern can be seen all over the web.

Unfortunately the techno optimism that we grew up with has given way to the stark reality that it is now easier than ever to manage the truth and squash dissent.

Which, btw, is the exact opposite of what we thought the Internet would be: the democratization of truth and voices. Instead we've allowed a handful of media oligarchs to own and distort the spin landscape.

dimator commented on NASA loses another senior official as tension about the agency's future grows   nbcnews.com/science/space... · Posted by u/xqcgrek2
jimbob45 · a month ago
Like the New York Jets, NASA did one generationally awesome thing in 1969 and have been riding on the goodwill from that for the last 56 years. Both claim that their failures are due to underfunding and management issues but fans are becoming suspicious.
dimator · a month ago
At the risk of feeding trolls: Voyager was 1969? Opportunity was 1969? Hubble was 1969? JWST was 1969?
dimator commented on NASA loses another senior official as tension about the agency's future grows   nbcnews.com/science/space... · Posted by u/xqcgrek2
dimator · a month ago
Of all the catastrophic outcomes of this administration, what's happening at NASA is one of the saddest. The premier science and exploration institution, built over years by our most gifted, so much given back to society, gutted and disabled. And all for fucking what?
dimator commented on Grok 4 Launch [video]   twitter.com/xai/status/19... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
dimator · 2 months ago
Seriously. The field is completely ripe with more mature offerings.
dimator commented on U.S. bombs Iranian nuclear sites   bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg3r... · Posted by u/mattcollins
hackerknew · 2 months ago
You’d be surprised, but the people of Iran have been waiting for this moment for years. There are 80 million people who want the end of the regime.

Whether this fulfills that goal, we will see, but anything that weakens the regime is good for the Iranian people.

dimator · 2 months ago
how does this do anything except strengthen the resolve of those thugs in power? even those against the regime will want retribution for an attack on their home land.

regime change has never worked, not with actual boots on the ground, let alone targeted air strikes.

dimator commented on YouTube's new anti-adblock measures   iter.ca/post/yt-adblock/... · Posted by u/smitop
Karupan · 2 months ago
I’d gladly pay for YouTube or other Google services when they offer an option to not track my activity at all. For me it’s not about seeing ads just on YouTube, but being tracked all through the web and still being served inappropriate or spammy ads.
dimator · 2 months ago
at this point, there's no use in implanting the goal posts into the ground, they're going to be moved again in a few seconds.
dimator commented on YouTube's new anti-adblock measures   iter.ca/post/yt-adblock/... · Posted by u/smitop
PurestGuava · 2 months ago
> If people don’t think there’s enough value in YT, then don’t pay and don’t use it.

The most common throughline of all pro-piracy discourse is that there's a lot of people who feel completely entitled to free entertainment, and they will come up with all sorts of bizarre mental gymnastics to justify that as something other than "I want free entertainment and don't want to see ads."

I don't think anyone could articulate a coherent logical argument as to why they feel they should get YouTube's services, and the entertainment produced by the creators who are on YouTube, while not paying either of them through any means, other than pure selfishness.

dimator · 2 months ago
You'll notice that it's always YouTube that is the target, though. People feel entitled to free YouTube as though by birthright. If someone doesn't like Netflix, they cancel and move on, they don't usually claim they deserve it free.

Maybe because it was not monetized originally, and so those who were around back then argue it must remain that way?

dimator commented on YouTube's new anti-adblock measures   iter.ca/post/yt-adblock/... · Posted by u/smitop
zwnow · 2 months ago
Why would you pay though its really simple to block ads and youtube is already rich enough. Why bow down to consumerism and enrichment of the already rich?
dimator · 2 months ago
Why pay for clothes? Nordstrom's is already rich enough, just walk in and take something.

u/dimator

KarmaCake day1274May 31, 2018View Original