Readit News logoReadit News
danny_codes commented on “Captain Gains” on Capitol Hill   nber.org/papers/w34524... · Posted by u/mhb
toephu2 · 11 days ago
Singapore pays its public officials high salaries primarily to ensure the integrity and quality of its government. The official justification centers on attracting top talent who could otherwise command high incomes in the private sector, thereby establishing a "clean wage" that reduces the financial incentive for corruption. Salaries are explicitly benchmarked to the median income of the nation's highest earners.

e.g.,

Singapore PM annual salary: ~$1.63 million USD

Singapore President salary: ~$1.14 million USD

danny_codes · 8 days ago
This makes so much sense to me. If the public sector is compensated the same or slightly better than the public, then naturally we’d attract the best people to the public sector.

Personally I never considered a career in the public sector mostly because there is an expectation in my country (US) that I would be poorly compensated.

danny_codes commented on The past was not that cute   juliawise.net/the-past-wa... · Posted by u/mhb
PeterHolzwarth · 8 days ago
"A woman's work is never done."

In our agrarian past, the cultural division of labor at the time said that men worked the field, women ran the home. And that later job was brutal, never-ending, and consumed all waking hours until the day she died.

Men broke their backs in the field, women consumed their lives doing the ceaseless work that never ended, every waking moment. (And occasionally helped out in the field, too).

Running a family was a brutal two-person job -- and the kids had to dive in to help out the second they could lift something heavier than a couple pounds.

We forget so easily that for the entire history of our species - up until just recently - simply staying alive and somewhat warm and minimally fed was a hundred-hour-a-week job for mom and dad.

There are important downsides, but the Green Revolution - and dare I say it, the industrial revolution - was truly transformative for our species.

danny_codes · 8 days ago
You seem to be ignoring the vast majority of human history before we developed farming. Agriculture societies are a relatively brief period of our collective history.
danny_codes commented on OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race   theverge.com/news/836212/... · Posted by u/goplayoutside
danny_codes · 8 days ago
I don’t understand why anyone would think LLMs have a good moat. There’s no evidence to suggest that’s the case, and plenty of evidence to the contrary. Maybe hubris?
danny_codes commented on SpaceX in Talks for Share Sale That Would Boost Valuation to $800B   wsj.com/business/spacex-i... · Posted by u/bko
gsibble · 9 days ago
What are you joking? Amazon is super far behind and unlikely to be able to launch its satellites in time to meet its FCC licensing requirements. They won't even be only for 24+ months. Meanwhile Starlink is growing very quickly.

Amazon is not a competitor until they actually have a viable product which they may never achieve.

danny_codes · 9 days ago
Starlink is not going to be a monopoly. The other big countries won’t allow it.

Like Tesla, SpaceX was ahead of the game by making big bets on new technology. Over time, that lead erodes when other players start competing. Tesla is now a declining player in EVs rapidly falling behind market leaders in AV and battery tech. I suspect spaceX will have a similar trajectory

danny_codes commented on SpaceX in Talks for Share Sale That Would Boost Valuation to $800B   wsj.com/business/spacex-i... · Posted by u/bko
spongebobstoes · 9 days ago
SpaceX has hints of monopoly, has shown consistent innovation, and has an ambitious long term vision. Boeing lacks all of the above, so it's apples and oranges
danny_codes · 9 days ago
I don’t know about that.

Europe and China are both working on reusable rockets. Blue Origin is doing the same.

Access to space is a national security thing so all big countries will fund their own alternatives.

Assuming the US continues to alienate its allies, I assume spaceX will be limited to the domestic market in 5-10 years. Why buy from the US when you can buy from more reliable players

danny_codes commented on Microsoft drops AI sales targets in half after salespeople miss their quotas   arstechnica.com/ai/2025/1... · Posted by u/OptionOfT
N19PEDL2 · 10 days ago
I think Microsoft's long-term plan is exactly that: to make Windows itself a subscription product. Windows 12 Home for $4.99 a month, Copilot included. It will be called OSaaS.
danny_codes · 9 days ago
Imagine subscribing to an OS when Linux exists.
danny_codes commented on Microsoft drops AI sales targets in half after salespeople miss their quotas   arstechnica.com/ai/2025/1... · Posted by u/OptionOfT
drumhead · 10 days ago
Too much money being spent on a technology that isnt ready to do what they're saying it can do. It feels like the 3G era all over again. Billion spent on 3G licences which didnt deliver what they expected it would.
danny_codes · 9 days ago
But this time, it’s trillions!

What could possibly go wrong

danny_codes commented on China Has Three Reusable Rockets Ready for Their Debut Flights   china-in-space.com/p/chin... · Posted by u/speckx
poszlem · 18 days ago
That take is unbelievably shortsighted.

A Far Side lunar base is not some cool sci fi brag. It is a massive strategic advantage, and brushing it off misses everything that actually matters.

The Far Side is the only place in the Earth Moon system where you can hide military hardware and basically disappear. No optical tracking, no radar, no interception. The Moon itself becomes a giant wall of rock that blocks sensors, lasers, and signals. It is the closest thing to perfect concealment anyone is ever going to get in space.

From that position, gravity is on your side. Sending kinetic weapons toward Earth takes almost no energy. Sending anything from Earth to the Moon takes a huge amount of fuel just to fight the gravity well. The attacker on the surface is always at a disadvantage, and the lunar side barely has to spend anything to strike.

A base on the Moon also survives whatever happens on Earth. Even a full scale nuclear exchange leaves it untouched. That means guaranteed retaliation. It becomes a true third strike platform, something no one can wipe out in a first strike. It locks in deterrence in a way that completely changes the strategic balance.

And if one country gets there first, mutual deterrence is over. They hold an untargetable, unreachable launch point that the rest of the planet cannot neutralize. That is not a symbolic win. It is unilateral control over the highest ground humanity has access to.

I honestly do not know why some people do not see it. This is literally rewriting Earth geopolitics. For hundreds of years we worked within Mackinder’s logic: Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; who rules the Heartland commands the World Island; who rules the World Island commands the World.

With a lunar base it becomes: Who rules the Moon commands cislunar space; who commands cislunar space commands Earth orbit; who commands Earth orbit commands the Earth.

This is not about pride or prestige. It is about who controls the one location in the solar system that offers absolute strategic dominance. Whoever controls the Moon controls the high ground.

Good luck competing with China if they get there first.

EDIT: Apparently posting six comments in thirty minutes counts as "You're posting too fast. Please slow down. Thanks. " and whoever decided that is a proper knob. I got throttled again, so if you reply, I can't respond anymore for now.

danny_codes · 18 days ago
This doesn’t make any sense. You must be trolling or a bot.

What good does inter-planetary bombardment do me? I already have enough nukes to destroy the world. I mean it’s a bit redundant

danny_codes commented on Roblox is a problem but it's a symptom of something worse   platformer.news/roblox-ce... · Posted by u/FiddlerClamp
maksum · 19 days ago
Can’t both be true? It can be true that Roblox keeps kids hooked through shady practices but if not them, kids would have sought other places. Club Penguin, RuneScape, WOW, Xbox Live, all served similar functions for myself growing up, I don’t find it hard to believe I would have ended up on Roblox
danny_codes · 18 days ago
None of those platforms are for gambling.
danny_codes commented on What OpenAI did when ChatGPT users lost touch with reality   nytimes.com/2025/11/23/te... · Posted by u/nonprofiteer
hereme888 · 20 days ago
This is ridiculous. The NYT, who is a huge legal enemy of OpenAI, publishes an article that uses scare tactics, to manipulate public opinion against OpenAI, by basically accusing them that "their software is unsafe for people with mental issues, or children", which is a bonkers ridiculous accusation given that ChatGPT users are adults that need to take ownership of their own use of the internet.

What's the difference than an adult becoming affected by some subreddit, or even the "dark web", or 4chan forum, etc.

danny_codes · 20 days ago
I think NYT would also (and almost certainly has) written unfavorable pieces about unfettered forums like 4chan as well.

But ad hominem aside, the evidence is both ample and mounting that OpenAI's software is indeed unsafe for people with mental health issues and children. So it's not like their claim is inaccurate.

Now you could argue, as you suggest, that we are all accountable for our actions. Which presumably is the argument for legalizing heroine / cocaine / meth.

u/danny_codes

KarmaCake day697April 19, 2020View Original