Readit NewsI'm sure the author is well intentioned and filled with integrity, however trashing a thing you created because you feel dejected is inherently self-interested and unworthy of attention.
If conversion rate drops 90%, the value of a click should also drop 90% as companies adjust the bids for ads.
I'm sure this isn't always true in practice and it takes time for bids to adjust. I'm just wondering how much impact this actually has.
And on the other side, if ad companies were better at filtering bots, their clicks become more valuable and companies should be willing to pay more.
No, they put this in lower manhattan because of the cell density there. It makes the fraud harder to detect in all the noise of normal usage.
Too many people talk about a bubble almost wish-casting that such a thing will make this all go away. It’s probably safest to assume your political enemies won’t be hoisted on their own petard anytime soon.
This can make the 'rate of deflation' that occurs worse:
* https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Deflationary_spiral
* https://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2014/06/the-perils-of-bitcoi...
* https://crypto.bi/deflationary/
† I am aware of satoshis.
1. what if, ChadGPT style, ads are added to the answers (like OpenAI said it'd do, hence the new "ChadGPT" name)?
2. what if the current prices really are unsustainable and the thing goes 10x?
Are we living some golden age where we can both query LLMs on the cheap and not get ad-infected answers?
I read several comments in different threads made by people saying: "I use AI because search results are too polluted and the Web is unusable"
And I now do the same:
"Gemini, compare me the HP Z640 and HP Z840 workstations, list the features in a table" / "Find me which Xeon CPU they support, list me the date and price of these CPU when they were new and typical price used now".
How long before I get twelve ads along with paid vendors recommendations?