Trump in title articles should just be banned at this point.
Is it mitigated where the article is a discussion of coverage of Trump, rather than just ranting (in either direction)? This article was pretty nuanced, IMO.
It did cost taxpayers millions of dollars, and I assume that only a fraction of that will ever be repaid by the perpetrators.
1: https://www.mprnews.org/story/2025/09/24/feeding-our-future-...
I suspect this is similar - rich parents are doing anything for an edge in their child's education and can get any diagnosis they desire. It's an unfair system.
1: https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/27/24352968/pebble-smartwatc...
How does this work out on the IP and legal side? A portion of the OS is now open source, but that doesn't make google surrender the trademark does it?