https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extingu...
Users can get a bundled version that slowly breaks compatibility forcing vendors to align with the closed source version.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extingu...
Users can get a bundled version that slowly breaks compatibility forcing vendors to align with the closed source version.
They can add sufficiently popular functionality to said closed source fork and make the open source original a) obsolete and b) incompatible with the combined ecosystem, and thus deprive the users of a feasible free option.
And if the original can't compete it means the additional functionality was only going to exist because the financial model of the closed fork could pay for it.
RIP Firefox?
I don't think it's a particularly good counter-example.
When you see an idea pushed/accelerated to an absurd conclusion, you might more easily see what's wrong with it.
Like… it’s just a really, really, really good autocomplete and sometimes I find thinking of it that way cleans up my whole mental model for its use.