This model solved a complex networking issue that O3 PRO couldn't.
And it did it more quickly. Every O3 prompt took ~3-5mins to answer!!
For F R E E !!
This model solved a complex networking issue that O3 PRO couldn't.
And it did it more quickly. Every O3 prompt took ~3-5mins to answer!!
For F R E E !!
Decided to give PRO a try when I kept getting terrible results from the $20 option.
So far it's perhaps 20% improved in complex code generation.
It still has the extremely annoying ~350 line limit in its output.
It still IGNORES EXPLICIT CONTINUOUS INSTRUCTIONS eg: do not remove existing comments.
The opaque overriding rules that - despite it begging forgiveness when it ignores instructions - are extremely frustrating!!
If you’re launching a business, I would suggest making sure the business looks legitimate; if it’s a pet project, trying to make yourself sound like a big business and then not having the footprint gives off “fake”/scam/caution vibes. If you’re a solo dev, drop all the fake business stuff and get rid of the buzz words and “it can do everything” marketing and focus on what it excels at as an open source project.
People are going to be skeptical (rightfully) that a solo dev/no name company is going to suddenly drop a product that rivals those of massive companies. Either massive shortcuts were taken, or there is a high chance that it will be insecure, which is not something you want from a VPN or any of the other things it claims to do. If you’ve built on existing secure technologies, you should emphasizing them because known names that have a security history are going to build a lot more trust than a no-name product.
If a software is hard to explain the purpose of to an average person in a single sentence, you have an uphill battle. Listing more features isn’t usually going to be the answer, regardless of how accurate you’re attempting to be. “It’s a VPN! and a PaaS! and a ZTNA! And an API Gateway! and AI!” It screams “please download me” rather than “I’m here to solve a problem“, which is why I wouldn’t even bother to try it; the opposite of what any project is going for.
My intention isn’t to just be critical, but rather to point out things that are likely harming your efforts.
A developer/company with an opaque background that you're to trust to give access to backend systems using passwordless embedded SSH (no keys needed!).
That's a big NOPE.
(Also, even the answers OP has provided really give an AI bot vibe)
It may respond 99.99% of the time without any influence, but you will have no idea when it isn't.
"we also collect and process your voice inputs [..] We leverage this data for improvements and development [..] Sharing of your information [..] service providers [..] OpenAI" https://withaqua.com/privacy
No mention of privacy (or on prem) - so assumed it's 100% cloud.
Non-starter for me. Accuracy is important, but privacy is more so.
Hopefully a service with these capabilities will be available where the first step has the user complete a brief training session, sends that to the cloud to tailor the recognition parameters for their voice and mannerisms... then loads that locally.
Having this digital record entrusted to any company that is not under strong privacy controls should be frightening to parents.
School administrators figure the low-cost low-barrier-to-entry is well worth the long term privacy risk to children.
* Fortunately my children were out of school when this became common place - so kindly correct me if I'm mistaken.
As far as I understand it they're actually underwater on their API and even $20/month pricing, so we'll either see prices aggressively increase and or additional revenue streams like ads or product placement in results.
We've witnessed that every time a company's valuation is impossibly high: They do anything they can to improve outlook in an attempt to meet it. We're currently in the equivalent of Netflix's golden era where the service was great, and they could do no wrong.
Personally I'll happily use it as long as I came, but I know it is a matter of "when" not "if" it all starts to go downhill.
I've assumed that when AI becomes much more mainstream we'll see multiple levels of services.
The cheapest (free or cash strapped services) will implement several (hidden/opaque) ways to reduce the cost of answering a query by limiting the depth and breadth of its analysis.
Not knowing any better you likely won't realize that a much more complete, thoroughly considered answer was even available.
It's a huge industry.
It's a hugely under innovative, insular and overpriced industry that has been begging for disruption for decades.
Now that there's critical mass in an aging population, companies like Apple that have the clout and cash to ignore the threats of patent infringement can finally apply some real technical innovation to the problem.
Some recent examples from my history:
what video formats does mastodon support? https://www.phind.com/search?cache=jpa8gv7lv54orvpu2c7j1b5j
compare xfs and ext4fs https://www.phind.com/search?cache=h9rmhe6ddav1bnb2odtchdb1
on an apple ][ how do you access the no slot clock? https://www.phind.com/search?cache=w4cc1saw6nsqxyige7g3wple
The answers aren't perfect. But they are a good gloss and then the links to web sources are terrific. ChatGPT and Claude aren't good at that. Bing CoPilot sort of is but I don't like it as much.
Many times the answers seemed to be getting more and more incomplete or incorrect as time went on (to a variety of questions over a period of months). Even worse it would say it couldn't find the answer, yet the answer was among the sites noted as reference!
I've ended up mostly resorting to Bing and gpt 4o. Frankly, I'm hesitant to waste time trying this new version.
Their PRO models were not (IMHO) worth 10X that of PLUS!
Not even close.
Especially when new competitors (eg. z.ai) are offering very compelling competition.