Readit News logoReadit News
cal85 commented on Neuralink 'Participant 1' says his life has changed   fortune.com/2025/08/23/ne... · Posted by u/danielmorozoff
abrookewood · 8 hours ago
This is genuinely exciting, but I still can't help thinking about the Black Mirror episode where a woman requires a subscription to stay alive: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_People_(Black_Mirror)
cal85 · 2 hours ago
Don’t we all need subscriptions to stay alive?
cal85 commented on Iceland supermarket offering £1 reward for reporting shoplifters   bbc.com/news/articles/c70... · Posted by u/speckx
pavel_lishin · 12 days ago
Everything else aside, it just does not seem like an economic use of my time to find an employee, alert them to shoplifting, and stick around long enough to get the measly £1 credit on a loyalty card.
cal85 · 12 days ago
Also the social penalty for being a grass, the risk of major embarrassment if you’re mistaken or if it can’t be proved, the risk of running into the accused person later outside. It doesn’t make any sense.
cal85 commented on Open Lovable   github.com/mendableai/ope... · Posted by u/iamflimflam1
bravesoul2 · 16 days ago
I feel like "also trademark registration is not remotely relevant here" is a distracting statement then. Not necessarily wrong but easy for people to bikeshed over.
cal85 · 16 days ago
fair I retract “is not remotely relevant here” and offer “is not really relevant here”
cal85 commented on Open Lovable   github.com/mendableai/ope... · Posted by u/iamflimflam1
yencabulator · 17 days ago
What do you mean? It's literally the legal mechanism by which Lovable Labs Incorporated can prevent this guy from calling his thing open-lovable.
cal85 · 17 days ago
nope, fire your lawyer. you get a common law trademark by trading under a name. no need to register it. TM registration is just to streamline big corps chasing after lots of small abusers in a wackamole way, that’s all. if the abuse in question is as egregious as “I used their product name, barely modified, to market my own thing, which is not just in the same general market but a literal clone of their product” then a judge is not going to say “Ah but I see they didn’t send in a form to register their trademark, so yeah carry on with blatantly stealing their work lol”
cal85 commented on Open Lovable   github.com/mendableai/ope... · Posted by u/iamflimflam1
yencabulator · 17 days ago
Well, for starters, it's not spelled with that first e.

https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=99194755&caseSearchType=U...

cal85 · 17 days ago
also trademark registration is not remotely relevant here
cal85 commented on Open Lovable   github.com/mendableai/ope... · Posted by u/iamflimflam1
conradev · 17 days ago
As long as it’s not misleading: https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/content-removal-polic...

I am reminded of OpenNext (https://opennext.js.org/) even though Vercel has a Next.js trademark.

cal85 · 17 days ago
compliance with a github policy isn't really the issue lol
cal85 commented on Open Lovable   github.com/mendableai/ope... · Posted by u/iamflimflam1
cal85 · 17 days ago
Wait is this a Lovable clone that is actually called open-lovable? That seems bold
cal85 commented on Job-seekers are dodging AI interviewers   fortune.com/2025/08/03/ai... · Posted by u/robtherobber
cal85 · 23 days ago
If I understand right, this is about actual text chatbots, where they don't hide that it's an AI interview? I've not experienced one of those, but I don't think it would be as bad as the time I was interviewed by AI through a human relay on a video call. It took me a long time to realise. Sometimes I'd say something 'technical' and she'd say "Mmm yes, definitely," nodding lots while typing something, but I got the funny feeling she hadn't understood. So I recalibrated, but then a few questions later she'd say something that indicated she must have understood the technical thing I'd said earlier. So I thought: oh cool, I am talking with a fellow engineer after all – and I'd get a little more technical with my answers again. But then I'd get that same unconvincing nodding response. After a few rounds of this it hit me that I was being interviewed by an AI, relaying through a human who was smiling and laughing and chatting while not understanding what the AI and I were talking about. The rest of the interview felt really uncomfortable.
cal85 commented on The new literalism plaguing today’s movies   newyorker.com/culture/cri... · Posted by u/frogulis
snozolli · a month ago
There are a lot of things that bother me in recent movies. I feel like there's a "yay, we're making a movie!" attitude, where people are more concerned with proving that they're part of a culture rather than simply doing their job to the best of their ability.

The most egregious example is the amount of Wilhelm Screams I've heard, absolutely crammed into media. It's a proclamation of, "I'm a sound editor, and I'm in on the joke!" but all it does is pull me out of the story completely.

Another sound editor example is the amount of ice clinking in glasses and sloshing sounds of drinks, as if the protagonist's long-neck beer bottle is a half-empty jug being jerked around.

Impressive stunts are virtually non-existent now. Instead, they drive a custom-built, tubular-frame car, swerving wildly, while the camera jerks around on a crane. Everything is reskinned using CGI, and the end result is the desired car being driven by an apparent maniac who chooses a profoundly sub-optimal path through traffic.

Writers have to point out their cleverness in order to announce to the audience how clever they're being. It reminds me of eye-rollingly clever newspaper headlines.

Everything has been turned up to 11, but in the lamest way possible.

cal85 · a month ago
> more concerned with proving that they're part of a culture

So true! This feeling is everywhere in movies now.

cal85 commented on Problems the AI industry is not addressing adequately   thealgorithmicbridge.com/... · Posted by u/baylearn
Animats · 2 months ago
"A disturbing amount of effort goes into making AI tools engaging rather than useful or productive."

Right. It worked for social media monetization.

"... hallucinations ..."

The elephant in the room. Until that problem is solved. AI systems can't be trusted to do anything on their own. The solution the AI industry has settled on is to make hallucinations an externality, like pollution. They're fine as long as someone else pays for the mistakes.

LLMs have a similar problem to Level 2-3 self-driving cars. They sort of do the right thing, but a human has to be poised to quickly take over at all times. It took Waymo a decade to get over that hump and reach level 4, but they did it.

cal85 · 2 months ago
When you say “do anything in their own”, what kind of things do you mean?

u/cal85

KarmaCake day2001May 11, 2022View Original