Readit News logoReadit News
blamestross commented on Building a Plugin System for Rust: Native Libs vs. Scripting Language vs. WASM   kerkour.com/rust-plugins... · Posted by u/randomint64
blamestross · 4 days ago
I'm really interested in WASM as a general system for "Running possibly hostile code".

wasmi, discussed in the post, has a feature called "fuel" that i want in ever WASM interpreter ever. It lets me manage resource-based attacks in the WASM binary.

blamestross commented on US threatens extra tariffs, export bans, for nations that regulate Big Tech   theregister.com/2025/08/2... · Posted by u/belter
joules77 · 5 days ago
Have you checked why feudalism ended?
blamestross · 5 days ago
It ended? Just seems a bit more "timeshared" than before. One lord for your labor, another for your land. The illusion of a choice buys a lot of compliance.
blamestross commented on In the long run, LLMs make us dumber   desunit.com/blog/in-the-l... · Posted by u/speckx
blamestross · 9 days ago
Its all about who "us" are.

Individuals? Most information technology makes us dumber in isolation, but with the tools we end up net faster.

The scary thing is that it is less about making things "better" than it is making them cheaper. AI isn't winning on skill, its winning on being "80% the quality at 20% the price."

So if you see "us" as the economic super-organism managed by very powerful people, then it makes us a lot smarter!

blamestross commented on We’re Not So Special: A new book challenges human exceptionalism   democracyjournal.org/maga... · Posted by u/nobet
mettamage · 11 days ago
We would be able to challenge human exceptionalism way more effectively if we could fully decode the languages of other species. The first thing we'd notice is:

1. language features we have and they don't understand

2. language features we both have

3. language features they have and we don't understand

Probably in that order.

Then it's just a question of gathering a couple of different species that are seemingly intelligent. Such as: corvids, octopuses, whales, etc. And see if the species can be reasoned with. If so, then you can set up schools where you can train them on human things and vice versa. Eventually you can form interspecies groups and really test the hell out of things.

Doing it that way will really challenge human exceptionalism, as well as the exceptionalism of that particular species.

I know it sounds a bit far off, but I figured that we might be able to get there with AI. I mean, we're getting better and better at giving machines tons and tons of data, and it somehow makes some sense of it.

So far, I think it's not necessarily the human species that is exceptional. It's the revolutionary periods it went through in order to become more exceptional hunters, so we could dominate and control the world in the way we want to. Things such as: discovery of fire, agriculture (+ creating defensive settlements) and antibiotics. We couldn't kill bacteria for a long time. We still have trouble with viruses and are getting into trouble with bacteria again. Could dolphins or whales have done it too, if they were land creatures?

blamestross · 11 days ago
Biological autoencoders "go brrrr" and use every side-channel available.
blamestross commented on How to Not Build the Torment Nexus   buttondown.com/monteiro/a... · Posted by u/p3_1080
yummypaint · 23 days ago
It's pretty wild that software is the only "engineering" discipline without any concept of professional ethics or loyalty to human safety that superceeds the whims of the employer.

Why do people think that is? Have there been any attempts to change this from the inside over the past decade? Where are professional associations like the ACM in all of this? It's a shameful state of affairs and reflects poorly on the whole discipline.

People who design bridges and vehicles have real responsibilities and standards they are held to, yet somehow the software that actually runs these things is exempt.

This is how Boeing negligently murdered hundreds of people with MCAS. By taking responsibility for safety away from actual engineers and misplacing it with people who write software.

blamestross · 23 days ago
I think we need our own variant of the "iron ring" at this point. I wear a similar steel ring on my pinky as an oath reminder.

Its a lot of work to grass-roots something like that, and I don't have the charisma for it.

blamestross commented on I tried to replace myself with ChatGPT in my English class   lithub.com/what-happened-... · Posted by u/lapcat
brudgers · a month ago
Altman’s analogy didn’t hold up. Calculators were uncontroversial

Calculators are uncontroversial now. But when they first became cheap and widely available, they were not allowed in math classes. Then only four function calculators, then graphing calculators. But still today, programmable calculators are prohibited in many academic contexts.

blamestross · a month ago
Turns out education done right is vaguely a speed-run of how the knowledge was developed. Adding calculating tools makes sense as you advance the the corresponding point in the process. Honestly, I think there should be a chunk of precal and calc where they use slide rules only, then calculators of increasing complexity (or just increasingly complex features of one calculator).

"When will I use this in real life" is a declaration that you have no expectations of learning the next lesson that builds upon this one.

blamestross commented on Writing a good design document   grantslatton.com/how-to-d... · Posted by u/kiyanwang
blamestross · a month ago
I wish i was allowed by my employer /organization/work culture to write DD in a format this reasonable.
blamestross commented on Tokens are getting more expensive   ethanding.substack.com/p/... · Posted by u/admp
abtinf · a month ago
Lack of proper capitalization makes the text unreadable for me.
blamestross · a month ago
https://convertcase.net/browser-extension/

This extension might make the internet more accessible for you!

blamestross commented on The Rise of Vibeinsecurity   vibeinsecurity.com/... · Posted by u/matosdfm
blamestross · a month ago
Once more scifi becomes reality. "Hacking" in scifi was a joke until LLMs came along and made it an option after all!
blamestross commented on Working on a Programming Language in the Age of LLMs   ryelang.org/blog/posts/pr... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
blamestross · a month ago
The biggest implications of LLM and programming is this:

LLMs are autoencoders for sequences. If an LLM can write the code, the entropy value of that code is low. We know that already, most human communication is low entropy, but the LLMs being good at it implies there is a more efficient structure we could be using. All the embeddings are artifacts of structure, but the entire ANN model obfuscates structures it encodes.

Clearly there are better programming languages, closer fit to our actual intents, than the existing ones. The LLM will never show them to us, we need to go make/find them ourselves.

u/blamestross

KarmaCake day585October 16, 2016
About
Mad Computer Scientist https://miasma.space
View Original