Readit News logoReadit News
babycake commented on Too many Americans live in places built for cars – not for human connection   vox.com/features/23191527... · Posted by u/smn1234
dont__panic · 3 years ago
I've seen so much anti-car, pro-walkability, pro-transit, pro-bikeability sentiment online recently.

I really hope this is proof of the younger generations -- Millenials, Zoomers, and younger folks even -- waking up to the idea that the USA in particular has become a toxic environment thanks to cars. WFH was a big wakeup call, I think -- once you step away from the commute for a year or two, trying to sit in traffic again seems insane. I guess it's a successful "unboiling of the frog," where we realized that car infratructure has been turned up for the last century to unbearable levels.

I hate cars. I don't want to use them on a daily basis. I'm cheap, and I don't want to own one, or maintain one. I try to do everything I can by biking or walking, or transit if those aren't feasible. It is nearly impossible in 95% of the USA.

Selfishly, I really want the USA to bring city centers back to livable levels by banning most cars and redesigning them for humans. Otherwise I'm absolutely going to end up moving to Europe eventually -- likely the Netherlands -- because driving a car is just so unpleasant for me. I'd rather not learn a whole new language and leave my family and friends so far behind, but especially since covid I've come to realize that driving makes me miserable, and I need other ways to get from my home into the world.

babycake · 3 years ago
I've always wanted to bike, and the city finally said yes, let's make the city bike-friendly.

And then they go ahead and just paint a white bike lane right next to the car lane. Yea, even when politicians listen to their constituents, they just half ass the effort.

I'm not risking my life to ride in that bike lane, so I still use a car.

babycake commented on How workplace bullying went remote   bbc.com/worklife/article/... · Posted by u/trifit
DiggyJohnson · 3 years ago
I know how blunt and cynical this sounds, but as someone that (for whatever reason) consumes a lot of British news and culture I often get the feeling that the media is writing content for an infantilized public.

Does anyone else agree and/or have a better way of phrasing this perspective?

babycake · 3 years ago
I don't think people are dumb though. Most working class people see through the BS because they live it everyday. I'm not talking about just us, I'm talking retail, waiters, miners, etc. They've seen way more shit with their bosses and life experiences to know what's what.

I don't think it's infantilizing. I think since these major news sites are owned and backed by the rich, they have certain messages they want to push. And one idea they don't want people to know about is worker organization. The rich all have a vested interest to not mention it at all and instead want us to use their rigged process to resolve issues.

Here's an interesting video that shows every news station saying the exact same thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksb3KD6DfSI

babycake commented on How workplace bullying went remote   bbc.com/worklife/article/... · Posted by u/trifit
Am4TIfIsER0ppos · 3 years ago
So in this thread you say it bullying to both invite someone to lunch and not invite someone to lunch.
babycake · 3 years ago
Of course, it depends on the person. If the person doesn't want lunch, and the boss keeps singling you out to go, that kinda disrespects you. And vice versa.

People are not all the same. Some people are shy, some people are gregarious. Respect their nature, that's it. When someone who has power over you just disregards you as a person, that's both not professional AND abusive if it happens over and over again. It's not a hard concept to get.

babycake commented on How workplace bullying went remote   bbc.com/worklife/article/... · Posted by u/trifit
withinboredom · 3 years ago
Honestly, I’d hate to be invited to lunch with everyone because I would feel like I had to say yes. So inviting me constantly would be annoying. Now if I told my boss I didn’t like to be invited to lunch and they kept doing it… might be that they just don’t like me. I wouldn’t think that I’m being “bullied,” but that maybe I need to get involved in some office politics and hang out with my boss more to earn some respect.
babycake · 3 years ago
That could be considered harassment, yea. There was a dude who told his boss he didn't want a birthday party due to anxiety and his boss ignored him and just went ahead and did it anyway.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61141421

He got a 450$ million payout after the employee sued.

babycake commented on How workplace bullying went remote   bbc.com/worklife/article/... · Posted by u/trifit
babycake · 3 years ago
All these big publishers always parrot the same, 'just go to HR' as though that'll solve your problem. HR has always been the legal shield of the company; they exist to shield the company.

> one option is to take the issue to HR, especially if the perpetrator is a boss. Although speaking up takes courage, Sharma advises people do it sooner rather than later “so that matters can be treated with a sense of urgency, and they don't impact your mental wellbeing in the long term”.

Yea, that's just gonna get you fired depending on how severe the accusations are, and whether the person being accused has clout within upper management. If your boss is friends with the big boss, guess whose ass HR is gonna can?

Sadly, every time these articles come out from these big publishers, none of them suggest worker organization. That's the best way to fight back against these toxic practices, look how much worker benefits we've gotten over the back of dead workers just by banding together and pushing back: fire exits, reduced work hours, no child labor, etc.

babycake commented on How workplace bullying went remote   bbc.com/worklife/article/... · Posted by u/trifit
drugstorecowboy · 3 years ago
This expands the definition of "bullying" to include things like not inviting a co-worker to lunch with the rest of the group... while it could be a little rude, thats not bullying. Neither is a boss putting you on the spot in a zoom. Articles like this water down the definition of bullying so far that it makes the term meaningless.

You aren't entitled to love your job, your boss, your co-workers or the company and if you do they likely won't return the sentiment. They aren't your friends or your family and as long as you expect that from them you will be disappointed.

babycake · 3 years ago
That's absolutely false. Bullying doesn't have to be just physical abuse, everything you listed definitely counts. While you don't have to be 'friends' with people at work, that's kind of irrelevant. Why not ask why this behavior is even acceptable in the first place, especially when work is supposed to be a professional environment?
babycake commented on Tell HN: Google Photos API does not allow downloading original images    · Posted by u/tommoor
capableweb · 3 years ago
Not sure what you or Verge is talking about. You don't NEED double storage space to get your original photos.

1. Go to google.com/takeout

2. Select "Google Photos"

3. Select "Email download link" (which should be pre-selected)

4. Click "Create archive" or whatever it says

Now you just wait for the email to arrive, then click the link. No storage space needed anywhere, just click the link and download like any other HTTP transfer.

I've been doing this once every 6 months or so for years, have been the same way always. Probably the reason no one is raising hell about this is because you seem misinformed.

babycake · 3 years ago
My confusion is that if I have 10 GB of photos in my Google Photos, that counts towards the Google cloud storage. Gmail contents also contribute to the total cloud storage. So if Google Takeout is taking my 10 GB photos and creating 10 GB zip files for download, where is it gonna store those zip files? If I sent it to my gmail, doesn't that mean I'll get 10 GB of new zip files that takes up my gmail storage space?

If I send it to my Google Drive, then those 10 GB zip files take up my drive storage space... So Google Photos + zip files... that's 20 GB. Double the storage right? And if I don't have enough space to store those zip files, then I'll have to upgrade my storage space and pay more money...?

Where is Google Takeout storing those zip files if not on my storage space?

babycake commented on Ask HN: Should a 'no side projects' policy be taken seriously?    · Posted by u/throwaway9195
fileeditview · 3 years ago
To be honest.. if I needed to consult a lawyer for a new job I would just find another job.
babycake · 3 years ago
Yea I mean it's good advice to get a lawyer, but imagine you had to do that for every job offer. You'd be spending so much upfront just to get a job. And they don't even reimburse you for the cost of the modified contract from the hired lawyer if you accept.
babycake commented on Tell HN: Google Photos API does not allow downloading original images    · Posted by u/tommoor
babycake · 3 years ago
Wait really? I can't download my original file? Is there official docs on this, I couldn't find it on google. Instead I had to find it on here:

https://www.theverge.com/22440156/google-photos-download-sav...

> Now you get to choose from a variety of different options: Whether you want your data to be emailed to you as an attachment or sent to Drive, OneNote, Dropbox, or Box;

So does this mean I'll need DOUBLE the storage space in my google cloud just to download my photos in original quality?

What kind of horrible dark pattern is this... We need to raise hell on this issue, it's so ridiculous.

babycake commented on Coding as a greybeard    · Posted by u/jamesofthedrum
throw_acct_919 · 3 years ago
> ageism is a thing in tech

Managers are looking for people they can control, because companies and CEO and founders are looking for those, who they can control.

The thing is that folks who are 40-50+ are more smart when it comes to politics. It's almost impossible to screw them over with deadlines, dragging multiple times across the org. They know the law, and it's expensive to set unrealistic goals and paying with engineers' health for that. But this trick works with younger folks.

Managers can do all sorts of weird stuff to younger folks, and CEOs tolerate that:

- Work on weekends (I remember my manager was yelling at me when I didn't reply to him on Sunday, while I was working all day long on Saturday lol).

- Switch you, your team, and your folks to a totally different tech stack without a way to switch back, and see what happens (happened to me in Atlassian).

- Fire you when you sick - happened to me in Atlassian. Yes, it's illegal, but sometimes it is legal. You're getting back from being sick, and once they realize you gonna take more sick days, boom!

For example, once Atlassian found my wife has cancer, they tried to find ways to fire me. It happened September 2021. They know I gonna take extended medical leave to take care of her, and I'm eligible to do that every year. But no.

1 year after terminating my employment, my wife is still on treatment. Tomorrow is her 20th chemo.

I reached out to Mike Cannon Brookes and Scott Farquhar multiple times (Atlassian founders), it didn't help.

No reply, CEO and founders in tech tolerate ageism, and looking for ways to screw over younger folks because they can hire, and fire, and intimidate in a multitude ways.

The bottom line is that younger folks are more disposable, you can put more toll on their physical/mental health, and that's why there is a hire preference.

babycake · 3 years ago
Ah yes, the Shitlassian story. Read up on it here if you don't know about it: https://shitlassian.com/

u/babycake

KarmaCake day199October 23, 2019View Original