Readit News logoReadit News
artpepper commented on Twitter drops lawsuit, saying summons has been withdrawn   reuters.com/article/twitt... · Posted by u/anigbrowl
CaliforniaKarl · 8 years ago
What if HN could have a "related post" option? If you remembered (or searched for) the older post, you could then link a given post to some other post.

Oh! And then you could have people rate the relationships, just like they can rate comments!

Oh! And you can put it into the API, making everything into a linked list of stories!

Yes, let's make the schema even more complicated 8-)

Edit: To be clear, I do like the idea.

artpepper · 8 years ago
You just invented the semantic web. :-)
artpepper commented on Who Buried Paul? (1999)   ludix.com/moriarty/paul.h... · Posted by u/well_i_never
valuearb · 8 years ago
Well for a few years it could have been fairly argued that the Paul's talent had died, until Band on the Run was released at end of 1973.
artpepper · 8 years ago
I really like "Ram"
artpepper commented on California has the USA’s highest poverty rate, when factoring in cost-of-living   politifact.com/california... · Posted by u/mrb
xienze · 9 years ago
Two seconds of Googling would have led you to this:

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-obama-deportations-20140...

Which I'm sure you'll find credible since it's a left-leaning source.

artpepper · 9 years ago
That article does not dispute the claim that net immigration from Mexico has been negative.
artpepper commented on Has philosophy ever clarified mathematics?   mathoverflow.net/q/182215... · Posted by u/Dawny33
falcor84 · 9 years ago
Let me ask this - if/when the issues regarding the nature of causality and objective reality are finally resolved, will this be a result in physics or in natural philosophy?
artpepper · 9 years ago
If I knew, I'd be the next Hume :-)

I suspect it couldn't be a physics result, because the question is something like "Why does the universe follow natural laws at all" and/or "what IS a natural law, in metaphysical terms" ?

artpepper commented on We Need More ‘Useless’ Knowledge   chronicle.com/article/We-... · Posted by u/Petiver
leggomylibro · 9 years ago
I know that our budgets are already creaking under the load of our spending and entitlement programs, but I would absolutely love to see a taxpayer-funded initiative designed to funnel money towards anybody who wanted to put it towards use in citizen science or research.

I'm not sure what a program like that could look like in practice, though. You could put money directly into peoples' pockets through a sort of grant-like application process, ("I want to buy $250 worth of resistors, capacitors, chips, wire, and breadboards to make a new kind of fitbit prototype") but that would be an easy system to game, and a lot of the costs associated with experimenting with theoretical ideas comes from equipment anyways.

Because not everyone can afford or find room for a scanning electron microscope or a CNC lathe, right? Many cities have hackerspaces, but their capabilities often stop at hand tools and working with thermoplastics unless you're very lucky. So what about universities? They're present throughout the entire nation, often already publicly funded, and have access to functional research and manufacturing equipment.

Sadly, my experience trying to get even a few hours' use of any sort of university equipment, whether supervised, paid, through night classes, or otherwise, has been met with absolute stonewalls. If you don't pay full tuition, you can fuck right off.

So I'm not sure what the solution here is. What's an average person who wants to get into science supposed to do, besides be independently wealthy?

artpepper · 9 years ago
> I know that our budgets are already creaking under the load of our spending and entitlement programs

Federal budget has been ~ 30-35% of GDP since the '80s, although there was a spike during the Great Recession for obvious reasons.

artpepper commented on Has philosophy ever clarified mathematics?   mathoverflow.net/q/182215... · Posted by u/Dawny33
falcor84 · 9 years ago
Being a bit crude, I'd say that natural philosophy became natural science, philosophy of language became linguistics, and philosophy of mind became neuroscience in the same sense that primates "became" humans. The old ones still exist, but we generally don't particularly care about what they have to say anymore.
artpepper · 9 years ago
Physics is arguably the most successful branch of science (at least in terms of the accuracy of its predictions), and yet physics hasn't resolved the basic dispute between Hume and Kant regarding the nature of causality and objective reality.

Same thing is likely to hold vis-a-vis neuroscience and philosophy of mind.

artpepper commented on What the feud between Nabokov and Edmund Wilson says about translation   chronicle.com/article/Wor... · Posted by u/lermontov
leephillips · 9 years ago
I've read it and own the two-volume paperback version (someone made the mistake of asking me what I wanted for Christmas a few years ago).

The actual poem left me completely cold (and it's the only version I've ever read). The footnotes and everything else are fascinating. Everything in Nabokov's own voice is always, and everywhere, a joy to read. He was, as he tried to explain, creating a reference work, an aid to scholars and students, not a translation to "enjoy". You turn to it to find out what Pushkin wrote in his poem, rendered into English, as accurately as possible. Wilson just failed to understand the purpose of this work and his criticisms were irrelevant.

I'm interested in people's opinions of the Lombardo translations. Looking for a version of the Illiad to read.

artpepper · 9 years ago
That's the part I don't understand about their feud. (I haven't read the translation, just reviews of Beam's book.) It seemed clear that Nabokov's translation aims at a different purpose than more "readable" translations, and there is a valid place for both approaches.
artpepper commented on San Francisco Asks: Where Have All the Children Gone?   nytimes.com/2017/01/21/us... · Posted by u/jseliger
slizard · 9 years ago
The real problem starts with the idea/wording of "one / two income family". It trivializes the issue and is likely rooted in the dated "housewife" concept that forces people into a permanent role, dependence, and general lack of choice, a social structure that really needs reform (and has been to a great extent in many countries).

Why can't parents work (earn) and take care of their kids at the same time? Why assign a (permanent) role of stay-at-home-parent to essentially half of the adults (with children) risking unnecessarily trapping them in roles and financial state that's unfair.

artpepper · 9 years ago
Because the U.S. has evolved a model where childcare is very expensive and people are expected to work > 40 hours per week. We need public pre-K and a 30- to 40-hour workweek.
artpepper commented on I made my son cannabis cookies. They changed his life   washingtonpost.com/opinio... · Posted by u/SmkyMt
edblarney · 9 years ago
1) 'Jail' - I never said they should jail them. But they should jail the dealers, yes. Moreover, 'required rehab' would be beneficial.

In Canada (a prison in Ottawa, specifically) if you 'go in' an opioid addict, the actually give you 3 doses of methodone a day. A friend of mine in there for a few days (small thing) described them as insane zombies, banging on the door to the clinic when it was almost time for their next dose.

The 'short term' harm reduction ideal of 'giving them drugs' might be nice, but in the 'long term' - keeping people jacked on opioids for months at a time has to be one of the most cruel things imaginable.

2) I think that most 'high schoolers' grasp that heroin, meth and coke are far worse than weed.

3) This is a separate issue. In other countries, such as Canada, we still have 'the war on drugs' - and 'free healthcare'.

artpepper · 9 years ago
(3) isn't a completely separate issue. Incarceration sucks up a lot of public funds that could go toward treatment programs.
artpepper commented on New Year’s Resolutions for Introverts   quietrev.com/12-new-years... · Posted by u/shankarvellal
artpepper · 9 years ago
I still see a lot of people describe introversion as "not wanting to do what extroverts do", as if being an introvert is defined by an absence of something.

But for me, time spent by myself isn't an empty expanse that I'm too scared to fill with socializing. It's absolutely vital to me, it's when I can really think, write, read, be creative, experience my emotions, etc.

I'm fine with socializing (preferably in a small group, with close friends -- I don't get much out of parties or big get-togethers) but I need to make room in my schedule for solitude.

u/artpepper

KarmaCake day193January 4, 2016View Original