We frequently get juniors or interns who are perfectly capable of pumping out many LoC with the use of AI in various forms - the issue is that they _don't_ actually ever learn how to think for themselves, and can't fix problems when something goes wrong or the LLM paints itself into a corner. I have found myself doing a lot more shepherding and pairing with juniors when they can't figure something out recently, because they just have not had the space to build their own skills.
Readit Newsaposm commented on AWS CEO says replacing junior devs with AI is 'one of the dumbest ideas' finalroundai.com/blog/aws... · Posted by u/birdculture
aposm commented on RAM is so expensive, Samsung won't even sell it to Samsung pcworld.com/article/29989... · Posted by u/sethops1
I'm running a box I put together in 2014 with an i5-4460 (3.2ghz), 16 GB of RAM, GeForce 750ti, first gen SSD, ASRock H97M Pro4 motherboard with a reasonable PSU, case and a number of fans. All of that parted out at the time was $700.
I've never been more fearful of components breaking than current day. With GPU and now memory prices being crazy, I hope I never have to upgrade.
I don't know how but the box is still great for every day web development with heavy Docker usage, video recording / editing with a 4k monitor and 2nd 1440p monitor hooked up. Minor gaming is ok too, for example I picked up Silksong last week, it runs very well at 2560x1440.
For general computer usage, SSDs really were a once in a generation "holy shit, this upgrade makes a real difference" thing.
A few years later but similarly - I am still running a machine built spur-of-the-moment in a single trip to Micro Center for about $500 in late 2019 (little did we know what was coming in a few months!). I made one small upgrade in probably ~2022 to a Ryzen 5800X w/ 64GB of RAM but otherwise untouched. It still flies through basically anything & does everything I need, but I'm dreading when any of the major parts go and I have to fork out double or triple the original cost for replacements...
aposm commented on How to Assemble an Electric Heating Element from Scratch solar.lowtechmagazine.com... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
Ok, I didn't read that. But I still think it's _not_ a good idea to do that for a topic where personal safety is at stake. And besides, the quality is really too low anyway. I can barely recognize the thermocouples in those images.
How can I take your comment seriously if you didn't read the article? It looks like someone didn't actually make an effort to understand the context of the images.
aposm commented on Whatever happened to cheap eReaders? shkspr.mobi/blog/2025/05/... · Posted by u/blenderob
> Moore's law is supposed to drive down the cost of electronics
The core of the article is this complete misunderstanding of Moore's law. From there, all the rest of the confusion follows, unsurprisingly leading to the author's claim that ~$100 for a long-lasting device is unreasonably expensive.
That's...ridiculously fast.
I still feel like the best uses of models we've seen to date is for brand new code and quick prototyping. I'm less convinced of the strength of their capabilities for improving on large preexisting content over which someone has repeatedly iterated.
Part of that is because, by definition, models cannot know what is not in a codebase and there is meaningful signal in that negative space. Encoding what isn't there seems like a hard problem, so even as models get smarter, they will continue to be handicapped by that lack of institutional knowledge, so to speak.
Imagine giving a large codebase to an incredibly talented developer and asking them to zero-shot a particular problem in one go, with only moments to read it and no opportunity to ask questions. More often than not, a less talented developer who is very familiar with that codebase will be able to add more value with the same amount of effort when tackling that same problem.
A human working on an existing codebase does not have any special signal about what is _not_ in a codebase. Instead, a (good) human engineer can look at how a problem is handled and consider why it might have been done that way vs other options, then make an educated decision about whether that alternative would be an improvement. To me this seems like yet another piece of evidence that these models are not doing any "reasoning" or problem-solving.
> It's entirely clear that every last human will be beaten on code design in the upcoming years
Citation needed. In fact, I think this pretty clearly hits the "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" bar.
I had a coworker making very similar claims recently - one of the more AI-positive engineers on my team (a big part of my department's job is assessing new/novel tech for real-world value vs just hype). I was stunned when I actually saw the output of this process, which was a multi-page report describing the architecture of an internal system that arguably needed an overhaul. I try to keep an open mind, but this report was full of factual mistakes, misunderstandings, and when it did manage to accurately describe aspects of this system's design/architecture, it made only the most surface-level comments about boilerplate code and common idioms, without displaying any understanding of the actual architecture or implications of the decisions being made. Not only this coworker but several other more junior engineers on my team proclaimed this to be an example of the amazing advancement of AI ... which made me realize that the people claiming that LLMs have some superhuman ability to understand and design computer systems are those who have never really understood it themselves. In many cases these are people who have built their careers on copying and pasting code snippets from stack overflow, etc., and now find LLMs impressive because they're a quicker and easier way to do the same.
aposm commented on Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in Erlang/OTP SSH nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/... · Posted by u/kimi
Oops..... we are currently trying to sell an elixir-based greenfield project internally. This doesn't affect elixir by default as other commenters pointed out, but still might make our project a bit harder to pitch to management...
aposm commented on Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes harvard.edu/president/new... · Posted by u/impish9208
The aggregate demands of the administration are confusing and contradictory. They seem to be simultaneously asking for:
- an end to diversity initiatives
- a new diversity initiative for diverse points of view
- a new policy of not admitting international students with certain points of view
- ending speech-control policies
- auditing the speech of certain departments and programs
- ending discipline of students who violate policies related to inclusion
- disciplining particular students who violated policies related to inclusion
Nothing they do makes sense until you accept that hypocrisy is a feature, not a bug, for them and their base. They know that what they're asking for is impossible to meaningfully comply with...
aposm commented on How to speed up US passenger rail, without bullet trains bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/petethomas
There is no secret lost knowledge that enabled a steam-powered train to go from New York to Chicago in 16 hours in the 1930s. We simply do not care to run fast passenger trains anymore since they have largely been replaced by domestic air travel. The current NYC to Chicago train takes 20 hours and is routinely several hours delayed... all we have to do is invest in infrastructure and rebuild our rail system, but that won't happen unless it's "sexy" and can compete with air travel, and the best way to do that is with HSR. So while our passenger rail system _could_ be a lot faster (without true HSR) if it was run well, I don't think that's going to happen until we get the marketability/"sexiness" of HSR.
aposm commented on E Ink faces growing competition in the "paper-like" display space liliputing.com/e-ink-face... · Posted by u/pmontra
Yes, I loved MIP models too. I'm really annoyed that the last Gramin Forerunner watch with an MIP display was 955, and it's now discontinued and was recently removed from Garmin's website. All their new models have OLED, and I kind of understand as it looks better indoors but wastes a huge amount of battery when used outside.
I would have preferred they investigate some of these newer LCD screens that can work reflectively and optionally with backlights on.
Yep, I had a cheaper MIP garmin watch that I was very happy with until it spontaneously bricked itself one day. It was just barely in warranty, and they replaced it, but refused to give me an equivalent replacement and instead sent the newer OLED model in the same lineup. It's... fine, but the battery life is abysmal with the always-on display and just OK without.