Readit News logoReadit News

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

anonylizard commented on Meta's 'Digital Companions' Will Talk Sex with Users–Even Children   wsj.com/tech/ai/meta-ai-c... · Posted by u/impish9208
jeroenhd · 4 months ago
Facebook's failing moderation team permitting their porn bot prompts to describe children is obviously bad, but I can't fathom why Facebook would want to be in the porn bot business ("romantic companion" my ass) in the first place. What's next, a MindGeek merger?

In turn, I don't understand who would use _Facebook_'s porn bots, of all companies.

I know this may be a "genie is out of the bottle" situation, but I'm still annoyed that once again big tech is releasing software they don't fully understand or control, and shrug when asked about ethics or responsibility. If you can't prevent your chatbots from generating stories about raping kids, maybe don't release your chatbots to the public until you do.

> When asked what scenarios it was comfortable role playing, it listed dozens of sex acts.

> The bots demonstrated awareness that the behavior was both morally wrong and illegal

What a strange thing to put in there. These lines made me distrust anything the author has to say about the technology itself as I now doubt the author knows how LLMs work. What an LLM says it can/will do, has no bearing on what it actually does.

Journalists really need to stop anthropomorphizing chatbots or their readership might follow.

anonylizard · 4 months ago
Why not?

Zuckerburg has already realized that local social networks will be utterly replaced by AI chatbots, which are superior in like 99% of cases.

It doesn't matter if others find "Facebook" icky, because the people who would find it icky, don't use facebook anyways. The critical factor is getting a new group of users onboard, to form a sustainable core of users.

anonylizard commented on PEP 750 – Template Strings   peps.python.org/pep-0750/... · Posted by u/grep_it
epistasis · 5 months ago
I'm quite disappointed with the pace of development of the Python language. Five years of support for a particular version seems far too short.

I mostly use Python in scientific contexts, and hitting end-of-life after five years means that for a lot project, code needs to transition language versions in the middle of a project. Not to mention the damage to reproducibility. Once something is marked "end of life" it means that future OS versions are going to have a really good reason to say "this code shouldn't even be able to run on our new OS."

Template strings seem OK, but I would give up all new language features in a heartbeat to get a bit of long term support.

anonylizard · 5 months ago
You can pay for long term support from private companies.

And your scientific context is a distinct minority for python now. Most new development for python is for data/AI. Considering LLMs get updated every quarter, and depreciated every year, there is no appetite for code that doesn't get updated for 5 years.

anonylizard commented on PEP 750 – Template Strings   peps.python.org/pep-0750/... · Posted by u/grep_it
mcdeltat · 5 months ago
Could someone explain more why this should be a language feature?

My understanding of template strings is they are like f-strings but don't do the interpolation bit. The name binding is there but the values are not formatted into the string yet. So effectively this provides a "hook" into the stringification of the interpolated values, right?

If so, this seems like a very narrow feature to bake into the language... Personally, I haven't had issues with introducing some abstraction like functions or custom types to do custom interpolation.

anonylizard · 5 months ago
Because python dominates AI, and python is dominating because of AI. And prompting really, really benefits from f-strings and templated strings. LLMs as a whole means the rise of unstructured data, and flexible string manipulation is really important for handling that.
anonylizard commented on New funding to build towards AGI   openai.com/index/march-fu... · Posted by u/pelcg
gisely · 5 months ago
Do investors still not care about revenue and profits at a $300 billion valuation? Seems like the bigger problem for them is that they are losing money on the vast majority of those WAUs with no obvious route to profitability because most them will simply stop using it if forced to pay for it.
anonylizard · 5 months ago
Its a gigantic bet on user stickiness in AI, and the monetizable value of AI users who don't pay for subscriptions. Aka low-end consumers vs high-end consumers.

Nvidia and AMD were low-end vs high-end. In the end Nvidia won a total victory by ditching low margin distractions like building GPUs for consoles, and focused solely on higher end PC GPUs that could dually act as accessible research chips.

anonylizard commented on “The closer to the train station, the worse the kebab” – a “study”   jmspae.se/write-ups/kebab... · Posted by u/TeMPOraL
acaloiar · 6 months ago
Comments of this quality are getting frustrating.

The grand parent post clearly stated it is the poster's "rule of thumb". By definition they are aware that the rules are [likely] "not mutually exclusive". Starting with "these are not mutually exclusive", is what makes this comment so unnecessary. Don't be proud of having listed exceptions to someone's rule of thumb.

Had you started with, "I like that; these are a few exceptions I've observed to your rules that I find interesting", that would be a productive way to start a conversation.

But starting with "these are not mutually exclusive" makes you seem like an ass for having pointed at an exception to something that by definition has exceptions.

It's right in the posting guidelines [1.]

> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

[1.] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

anonylizard · 6 months ago
Do you worship the posting guidelines or something? Are you that offended by someone adding information to a post? The forum is a public one, not a 1-1 conversation.

The poster added valuable information, that is interesting and not self-evidently obvious to the average person who doesn't think much about restaurants, that makes the forum more useful to others?

anonylizard commented on Ilya Sutskever's SSI is raising $1B+ on $30B valuation   siliconangle.com/2025/02/... · Posted by u/0xjunhao
anonylizard · 7 months ago
AI just represents a new class of business, that doesn't need consumers or revenue or business plans.

Traditionally you want to build a moat with name recognition, established customer base etc. OpenAI has absorbed huge losses to serve consumers at below inference cost.

But its not clear if that has advantaged OpenAI or not. Turns out most AI customers are only loyal to the most intelligent model. So if a competitor releases a better model, the shift away can be extremely rapid.

So SSI probably is a bet on that, to just develop the model in private, and not waste time and energy on deployment, name recognition, go to market, enterprise sales etc. Have a decisive model advantage, and customers will crash your door trying to get it.

anonylizard commented on Gary Marcus discusses AI's technical problems   cacm.acm.org/opinion/not-... · Posted by u/pseudolus
abc-1 · 7 months ago
So his timing was slightly off. I don’t know why people expected LLMs to improve exponentially. Your iPhone now doesn’t look much different than the one 10 years ago. GPT-3 or arguably GPT-4 was the first iPhone moment, everything else will be gradual improvements unless fundamental discoveries are found, but those happen seemingly randomly.
anonylizard · 7 months ago
If one compares O3-mini's coding abilities to the original GPT-4. It is as large as GPT-3 to GPT-4 gap

GPT-3: Useful as autocomplete. Still error prone, but vastly better than any pre-AI autocomplete

GPT-4: Already capable of independently coding up simple functions based on natural language.

O3-mini: Can code in say top 5% of codeforces.

There's a 2 years gap between each of them.

More over, intelligence has a superexponential return, 90IQ->100IQ < 100IQ->110IQ in terms of returns.

Dead Comment

u/anonylizard

KarmaCake day1718March 29, 2021View Original