Readit News logoReadit News
angadh commented on Claude finds contradictions in my thinking   angadh.com/contradictions... · Posted by u/speckx
doph · a month ago
The article you link is a very specific type of failure that apparently did not happen in this instance, where Claude was able to access the author's writing. And the author apparently found the insights useful, though the lack of analysis from the author on that value makes this article basically meaningless for an outsider.

I am apparently a different type of person than the author because my obsidian vaults look nothing like theirs, but I can't imagine asking an LLM for a meta-analysis of my writing. The whole point of organizing it with Obsidian is that I do that analysis myself - it is part and parcel of the organization itself.

angadh · a month ago
Appreciate the thought—my comments in Claude's analysis are now added on the margins.

The exercise is not meant to do much else but spot patters in my thinking that I can reflect on. Nothing particularly novel here from Claude but it is helpful, for me, to get external feedback.

angadh commented on Claude finds contradictions in my thinking   angadh.com/contradictions... · Posted by u/speckx
furyofantares · a month ago
I scrolled to the bottom looking for the part where the author says which of these contradictions are meaningful to them, and didn't find anything. If any of the LLM output is meaningful here's, the author is going to have to tell me.

I was skimming so maybe I missed it. But if this is just raw LLM output, I don't see the value.

angadh · a month ago
This post is updated now to have these reflections on the margin notes. No need to scroll down. I was not done with this post when whoever found it here linked to it.
angadh commented on Claude finds contradictions in my thinking   angadh.com/contradictions... · Posted by u/speckx
AIPedant · a month ago
Maybe it would be better to prompt topic-by-topic. I think as it stands Claude is essentially hitting you with the Barnum effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect (I think a lot of laypeople use LLMs as a modern replacement for tarot or astrology.)
angadh · a month ago
Thanks also for the link—didn’t know about the Barnum effect!
angadh commented on Claude finds contradictions in my thinking   angadh.com/contradictions... · Posted by u/speckx
AIPedant · a month ago
Maybe it would be better to prompt topic-by-topic. I think as it stands Claude is essentially hitting you with the Barnum effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect (I think a lot of laypeople use LLMs as a modern replacement for tarot or astrology.)
angadh · a month ago
Usually that’s what I typically do in talking with Claude but my first vault is so haphazard at this point that it’s a bit of a lost cause.

This prompt to find contradictions was merely to see where the contradicting notes are, as a little toy experiment.

I still have to annotate this post as it allows me to see what I do and don’t agree with Claude on.

However, this half-baked “AI slop” post is making me reflect on my style of working with my site; it usually gets little traffic so I put whatever I want on there but clearly someone has it in their feed and posted one of the less interesting posts here IMHO.

angadh commented on Claude finds contradictions in my thinking   angadh.com/contradictions... · Posted by u/speckx
AIPedant · a month ago
But this is a completely biased perspective! Look at this sycophantic crap:

  The most interesting pattern is that your core tensions haven’t resolved - they’ve become more sophisticated. You’re still working through fundamental questions about individual agency vs. systems, risk-taking vs. institutional engagement, and autonomy vs. collaboration. But your framework for thinking about these tensions has become richer and more nuanced.

  This suggests someone whose intellectual development is genuinely evolutionary rather than simply accumulative - you’re not just learning more facts, but developing better frameworks for holding contradictions productively.
It seems like the only insight Claude had was that "look at my vault and find contradictions in my thinking" is motivated by self-absorption, so it responded accordingly. It certainly had nothing intelligent to say about the actual subject matter!

angadh · a month ago
A better prompt could have been used—I literally was just getting started on this as a fun little thing to discuss with a friend that is travelling. It was not meant to show up here. facepalm moment
angadh commented on Claude finds contradictions in my thinking   angadh.com/contradictions... · Posted by u/speckx
ausbah · a month ago
did OP literally just post AI output covering their personal notes with no additional commentary? no reflections on if it was useful, accurate, or fair? just passing off an article that’s 99% AI slop as something insightful, amazing
angadh · a month ago
This links to my blogpost but I did not post it to HN.

This is as much a surprise/shock to me as it is to you :D

angadh commented on Starcloud can’t put a data centre in space at $8.2M in one Starship   angadh.com/space-data-cen... · Posted by u/angadh
GlenTheMachine · 2 months ago
Space roboticist here.

As with a lot of things, it isn't the initial outlay, it's the maintenance costs. Terrestrial datacenters have parts fail and get replaced all the time. The mass analysis given here -- which appears quite good, at first glance -- doesn't including any mass, energy, or thermal system numbers for the infrastructure you would need to have to replace failed components.

As a first cut, this would require:

- an autonomous rendezvous and docking system

- a fully railed robotic system, e.g. some sort of robotic manipulator that can move along rails and reach every card in every server in the system, which usually means a system of relatively stiff rails running throughout the interior of the plant

- CPU, power, comms, and cooling to support the above

- importantly, the ability of the robotic servicing system toto replace itself. In other words, it would need to be at least two fault tolerant -- which usually means dual wound motors, redundant gears, redundant harness, redundant power, comms, and compute. Alternately, two or more independent robotic systems that are capable of not only replacing cards but also of replacing each other.

- regular launches containing replacement hardware

- ongoing ground support staff to deal with failures

The mass analysis also doesn't appear to include the massive number of heat pipes you would need to transfer the heat from the chips to the radiators. For an orbiting datacenter, that would probably be the single biggest mass allocation.

angadh · 2 months ago
Thanks for the thorough comment—yes, the heat pipes etc haven’t been accounted for. Might be a future addition but the idea was to look at some key large parts and see where that takes us in terms of launch. The pipes would definitely skew the business case further. Similarly, the analysis is missing trusses.

Don’t even get me started on the costs of maintenance. I am sweating bricks just thinking of the mission architecture for assembly and how the robotic system might actually look. Unless there’s a single 4 km long deployable array (of what width?), which would be ridiculous to imagine.

angadh commented on Starcloud can’t put a data centre in space at $8.2M in one Starship   angadh.com/space-data-cen... · Posted by u/angadh
ricardobeat · 2 months ago
The launch costs in the article look quite off from the outset.

A Falcon Heavy launch is already under $100M, and in the $1400/kg range; Starship’s main purpose is to massively reduce launch costs, so $1000/kg is not optimistic at all and would be a failure. Their current target is $250/kg eventually once full reusability is in place.

Still far from the dream of $30/kg but not that far.

The original “white paper” [1] also does acknowledge that a separate launch is needed for the solar panels and radiators at a 1:1 ratio to the server launches, which is ignored here. I think the author leaned in a bit too much on their deep research AI assistant output.

[1] https://starcloudinc.github.io/wp.pdf

angadh · 2 months ago
please read Table 1.
angadh commented on Starcloud can’t put a data centre in space at $8.2M in one Starship   angadh.com/space-data-cen... · Posted by u/angadh
v5v3 · 2 months ago
Same for me.

But does work if I rotate phone to landscape mode.

angadh · 2 months ago
should be fixed now.

u/angadh

KarmaCake day83June 26, 2025
About
https://angadh.com
View Original