Readit NewsA discovery that AGI is impossible in principle to implement in an electronic computer would require a major fundamental discovery in physics that answers the question “what is the brain doing in order to implement general intelligence?”
So the question is whether human intelligence has higher-level primitives that can be implemented more efficiently - sort of akin to solving differential equations, is there a “symbolic solution” or are we forced to go “numerically” no matter how clever we are?
Castlevania... [so] called because it is a Metroidvania game set in a Castle.
Also a bit frustrating because the first Castlevania itself isn't actually a metroidvania, it's a more conventional action-platformer. Castlevania II has non-linear exploration, lots of items to collect, and puzzle-solving, all like Metroid. So it's not too surprising Antithesis had to do a lot of work for adapting their system to Metroid - but I wonder if this work means it now can handle Castlevania II without much extra development.
I‘ve yet to see a convincing article for artificial training data.
edit for comment below: Its not about laziness for me. Its the displeasure of wading through junk that internet has become. I just don't have brain capacity or the smarts to outwit the scammers .
[1] If the search takes more than a few minutes then the AI overview is almost guaranteed to be wrong or useless.
That said, "GPT-5 will not be any better than competitors' products, demonstrating OpenAI was bluffing about AGI and destroying investor exuberance" was a very specific prediction made by (for example) Gary Marcus.
The headline on HN at the moment is "As Alaska's salmon plummet, scientists home in on the killer". The headline on the article itself is "As salmon in Alaska plummet, scientists home in on a killer". I don't see any way to read those as suggesting science is killed the salmon.
As Alaska's salmon plummet, scientists home in on the killer - Science - AAAS
So you are either poor or too lazy to buy a book from the store. But this doesn't justify mind theft or it's distribution.
I think "k" was also known as "Gaussian gravitational constant" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_gravitational_constan...
But the value and unit of "k" given in the Wikipedia page is different. Do you know what NASA document means by "universal gravitational constant" in modern sense?
Gauss's constant k is defined as sqrt(G), but for a while the international standard was to define k and then compute G as k^2, which is why NASA refers to it that way.
"Information wants to be free," which means that any cost of producing that information can be abstracted away due to ideological inconvenience.