The gridlock is simply the manifested reality that legislation is fully pay to play, but if you're paying that's not your problem.
(this is a joke btw)
EDIT: wait, what if the repeater was amplifying light going the other direction (coming out) or on a different strand?
* https://www.readyforwildfire.org/more/fireworks-safety/
* https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/fireworks-spark-dozens-o...
* https://www.nfpa.org/education-and-research/home-fire-safety...
** https://www.ptsd.va.gov/understand/what/fireworks_ptsd.asp
** https://www.va.gov/hines-health-care/stories/how-your-firewo...
SMIC is generously 1-2 nodes behind Intel at this point and have only caught up since we've started utilizing sanctions?
Intel meanwhile has not had to compete in any other sense than process technology in decades.
They've been habitually humiliated by any competitor with access to any process no matter how dated for the simple fact that they're trying to compete not maximize monopoly extraction with that process.
They've abandoned numerous innovations simply because they weren't extractive enough compared to inferior alternatives.
I don't think any amount of tipping the scale with sanctions is going to save Intel from being savaged into a mist of blood and insolvency the moment a competitor enters the arena without a process technology disadvantage, and that much seems inevitable now.
It's simply not in their DNA to survive in that environment.
On the other hand, I suppose lobbying for sanctions and subsidies would be textbook Intel strategy.
I feel like the author doesn't really need to introduce the concept of black hole computation to draw an equivalence between simulation theory and interacting with reality to achieve an intended state, though.
In a sense any time you manipulate reality you are simulating a new reality in a computational subset of your prior reality, with similar implications whether or not any part of the computation falls into a black hole or involves digital logic.
I think at least some part of simulation theory must be true because it is trivially equivalent to having consequences in reality, and black hole computation as described would just be a limiting case where the mass-energy is potentially fully occupied by a single computation approaching infinite space and time complexity.
How?
There is no "commercially available database" that can detect if a child is using their parent's name.
There is no "commercially available database" that can detect if a child is using a photo of their parent's ID.
Kids are smarter than conservative lawmakers.
You need to pay their cronies the protection fee or something unfortunate might happen to your porn site.
With a side helping of pandering to the christofascist base, which laps up transparent corruption up as long as they flog the sinners a few times a session.
It is, quite simply, why I left North Carolina.
> From: Joaquín Baldwin, @joabaldwin > Of note: if a customer orders a copy from Amazon, and a damaged, returned book > is shipped to them instead, no new KDP printing orders kick in. This means I > don’t get paid at all, because they only pay me when a book is printed. They > stole my money while scamming a customer.
So the author wants to be paid royalties on books he says are "damaged" that are brand new but that he says can not be sold to customers?
We recently discussed abuses of copyright law. This qualifies as an abuse of copyright law IMHO.
It's not that he wants to get paid for the unsold inventory, it's that he believes he doesn't get paid at all when they resell as new the used inventory he rejected and returned in quality control of his royalty free author purchase.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&h...
if you want some entertaining reading go ahead and browse through Eduardo Pasiliao's research at your working city there:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Caw-nkAAAAAJ&hl=en
I'll summarize it for you: computational propaganda with an emphasis on discerning and disrupting social network structure.