Overall: nothing.
If all of Facebooks gaffs have failed to bring it down, this surely won't bring down Reddit.
For comparison, when Digg 2.0 came out, people just moved to Reddit immediately, they didn't complain about it on Digg, and vow to leave eventually. They just left and never looked back. I'm generalizing; of course there are counterexamples.
I think we've made an internet where there aren't a ton of viable competitors, so there is no easy path out. The choice is to either get the dopamine hit from the same place as before, or forego the dopamine hit altogether, and for a lot of people the answer is clear.
I'd love to be wrong about this though.
https://a16z.com/2011/04/14/peacetime-ceo-wartime-ceo/
Although personally, I’m not seeing chatGPT bulldoze the world just yet. They need to monetize it, which means ads. Are they better at ads than the others? It’s not a given
Is it ok to predict that, like so many things before, the noise of chatGPT will die out more quickly than we imagine?
I understand in early 2000s we were using spinning disks and it was the only way. Well, we don't use spinning disks any more, do we?
A modern server can easily have terabytes of RAM and petabytes of NVMe, so what's stopping people from just using postgres?
A cluster of radishes is an anti-pattern.
Thus, it's much cheaper to run at massive scale like OpenAI's for certain workloads, including KV caching
also:
- robust, flexible data structures and atomic APIs to manipulate them are available out-of-the box
- large and supportive community + tooling
Meta, Amazon, Stripe, Twilio, Salesforce etc are all profitable companies. That’s where the majority of non crypto layoffs came from.
If I were building a new startup in 2023, I would need a mountain of evidence against using Spanner. It's ugly that it locks you into GCP but hey an iPhone locks you into Apple's ecosystem, that's just the price you pay to get good things.
* unless you need timeseries, columnar, FTS, geospatial, graph or something special like that