Readit NewsIt is not necessarily hypocrisy. I haven't paid too much attention, but does the US say China banning Facebook or Google is anti free speech?
If not, then the US is not being hypocritical. Perhaps, double standards or something like that is more of what you were looking for?
>Ban it by all means, but you will become just like China
China builds roads. If the US builds roads it will become just like China.
>a state that censors information and speech from its citizens because the government is scared of it.
You think Europe is doing this when they banned RT, right?
I don't think this is the case. The average person wants a lot of things for cheap. Also, more expensive items like computers and phones would increase in price. People like having the newest phones, but might be priced out of it if it increased.
As an aside, it'll be interesting to see what license he open sources it under.
>One of the things that I believe Twitter should do is open-source the algorithm.
>Any changes to people's tweets -- if they're emphasized or de-emphasized -- that action should be made apparent ... so there's there's no sort of behind-the-scenes manipulation, either algorithmically or manually.
>Some will say that this narrows the kind of roles that we can hire for. In particular, different roles can have very different comp models (sales often has a significant commission component in exchange for a lower base, for example). There is truth to this too – but for the moment we’re going to put this in the "but-this-can’t-scale" bucket.
Regardless, here are two big reasons why Signal is superior.
1. Not owned by Facebook
2. Open Source
https://pressprogress.ca/it-was-violent-peoples-commission-r...