Reminds me of us vs Japanese tv shows. Theirs often last only a season or two and the stories are good. Ours go on and on till we are sick of them.
Cities stop being "easy to navigate by car" when they have too many cars around. And car-congested streets are also very hostile to bikes and pedestrians, so it's very hard to correct the problem once it gets ingrained. So it makes sense to give the latter uses high priority, and keep car use as a rare exception.
Reading about their falling out at Tanglewood in the 90s, Ozawa appears to have been a decisive chief executive too[2].
[1] https://www.discogs.com/release/14527513-Ravel-Prokofiev-Bri...
[2] https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/lifestyle/1998/01/12/e...
But for the scientists that wrote the original code, maybe not. Maybe they think of this sort of thing as drudge work, something that doesn't really hold their interest. Their fun is in designing the mathematical concept, and turning it into code is just a chore.
So yeah, we could teach scientists. But even better would be if we could provide scientists with tools that are just naturally fast when expressing problems on their own terms.
Just expand conditional probabilities and use the law of total probability.
Intuitively, first pick red means the urn is more likely to be filled with red.