Yes, you're using a million transistors to do something you could have done with a couple of discrete passives, but it will often result in a lower total BoM and development time. Not always.
Now that I think about it, no, it's not even cheaper as XTALs are quite pricy compared to other discrete components.
I didn't mean to be rude - I interpreted the comment as "Would you like to build an (insert random object here)? Well, you can just BUY it and be done with it" - may not be as I put it (dumb) but certainly... simplistic and purpose-defeating
Don't sell perl 6 short. I am using perl 6 for significant projects now (after a career of perl 5) - and it's fundamentally different. I describe it as perl to the power of perl.
For me, expressiveness is fundamental. And perl 6 gives me that.
Perl 6 is simply suffering from python being everywhere. And perl 5 was always easy to lampoon as "line noise". It's a stupid quip, but it leaves a mark on new programmers. You don't even need to read the course and you can already have an opinion. Stupid kills? And then perl 6 doubled down on that anyway. Then I doubled down on that ALSO and I get to use (carefully chosen) unicode symbols in my line noise :-) So there.
Wee bit sexist...
EDIT: Yes I know it's a proverb, I'm not blaming the parent post.
EDIT: 4 downvotes? Nice.
For these sorts of things I tend to go to the circuit simulator[0].
Also, for a game that teaches about this stuff while still being incredibly fun, I highly recommend Turing Complete[1].
[0] http://www.falstad.com/circuit/circuitjs.html
[1] https://store.steampowered.com/app/1444480/Turing_Complete/
https://wccftech.com/no-samsung-isnt-phasing-out-of-the-cons...