Linux people are very resistant to this, but the future is going to be sandboxed iOS style apps. Not because OS vendors want to control what apps do, but because users do. If the FOSS community continues to ignore proper security sandboxing and distribution of end user applications, then it will just end up entirely centralised in one of the big tech companies, as it already is on iOS and macOS by Apple.
Because security people often does not know the balance between security and usability, and we end up with software that is crippled and annoying to use.
I wish it wasn't more or less a standard these days..
Which makes me believe that their "walk back" is just to change the packaging of the same old "slop" being shoved down their customers throats.
I am certain someone have the full source code somewhere, I just hope that they eventually say "f--k it, it has been 36 years, let the world have it".
But that is usually a fairly large group, and if they feel taxes are too much, they will listen to any politician that promises a solution.
Then it can become pretty nasty...
It may be cryptographically superior, but does that matter at the end of the day if nobody uses it?
I've made a few attempts to convert people, but no-go. People stay on Telegram and WhatsApp because they have better UX and features.
Signal refuses to see the value in good attractive UX.
BS took over Evernote and I cancelled the subscription after a year. Their idea of value for the customer vs the price is not realistic.
It is hard to vote, being buttered up with promises and pretty speeches, just to be disappointed halfway to next election.
Predators, racism, gore, pedophilia, harassment, stalking and so on..
No matter how high you value security, these are matters that hurt real people today. If you attract the mainstream, you must deal with it.