Sure, it can't hurt, but are those kids or their parents gonna go out and buy books, and then, you know, learn how to read?
I wonder what the numbers are like in the US...
[0] https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/regeringen-vil-afskaffe-mo...
Sure, it can't hurt, but are those kids or their parents gonna go out and buy books, and then, you know, learn how to read?
I wonder what the numbers are like in the US...
[0] https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/politik/regeringen-vil-afskaffe-mo...
And if you wonder why Denmark doesn't simply lower their VAT or introduce a split VAT system like in most other countries; the answer is technical inertia (or technical debt, if you will). Most Danish accounting and banking systems are hardcoded to assume 25% (or nothing). So if a politician want immediate change to VAT, removing it from a category of goods/services is their only option.
Edit: I realise I was careless in my wording, when I wrote "hardcoded to assume 25% (or nothing)"; I meant that the systems only assume one rate (or nothing), not that the value of 25% was hardcoded (though it is in a few (lesser) systems I've encountered). I apologise for the confusion.
How is this a Golang question?
> 471.What does SQLite not support compared to PostgreSQL?
I mean, I definitely use both SQLite and PostgreSQL in relation to Go. (Although my first thought when I saw the question was "true numeric types!", until I noticed it was not an option.)
As someone else suggested, it feels like the questions may well have been generated by a LLM, and then not filtered.
The common failure mode, for me, isn't hitting Ctrl-C for copy in a terminal by mistake, it's hitting Ctrl-Shift-C for copy in a browser and ending up with the console open, or hitting Ctrl-W to delete a word and having it close a tab.
The hacks about seems to be basically steal keyboard shortcuts the same way webpages already do; either through an extension[0] or modifying config-pref.js[1]. Neither of which seems very appealing to me. Though, funnily: I did hit Ctrl-W writing this message to delete a word; thank goodness for cache.
[0] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/shortkeys/
[1] https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/kilmm2/restore_ctr...
But jwz (XScreenSaver's creator and maintainer) doesn't give me much hope: https://www.jwz.org/blog/2025/07/xscreensaver-wayland-and-lo...
The full accepted article reads: "Disseminating pornographic content online without putting in place robust and effective age verification tools to effectively prevent children from accessing pornographic content online shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 1 year."
It's not law yet, as the first reading is now sent back to the Council of the European Union, but I don't think it's very likely it will get a second reading.
[1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2025-011...
> Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional conduct referred to in paragraphs 2 to 8 is punishable.
(Emphasis being the change.)
So they only mean the intentional act of putting up pornography without age verification? Just feign forgetfulness, I guess. How is a negative act an intentional one? Or moreover; how do you prove it? I know neglect and gross neglect are things, so I assume they mean if you don't do it after being asked to.
This page (cited by the article at the bottom) has a lot more context and somewhat detailed technical. Information.
Quoting article 3, §3 (i):
> radio equipment supports certain features in order to ensure that software can only be loaded into the radio equipment where the compliance of the combination of the radio equipment and software has been demonstrated.
The opening of §3 is:
> Radio equipment within certain categories or classes shall be so constructed that it complies with the following essential requirements:
* correctness/verifiability analyses
* security? in compiled tools (prevent malicious re-configuration)
* an assumption of the inertia of law
* general incompetence/naivete
???
However, introducing a split rate would definitely require a time frame of at least 4 years, and no politician are willing to wait that long for a politician win.