Readit News logoReadit News
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
mint5 · 24 days ago
I’ll defer to the majority of German newspapers - Germany is kind of an authority on this topic - it was a nazi salute.

The son of the apartheid, musk, even literally videoed in to Germany’s modern day extremist party, the afd, that same day.

Not a coincidence - musk is a racist white nationalist.

Sparyjerry · 19 days ago
The Germans tabloids hate him because he was destroying the German auto industry with better vehicles and isn't supporting their liberal party. Musk has never done anything racist ever.
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
GetTheFacts · 23 days ago
Sparyjerry · 19 days ago
Wrong. The other person brought it up who i replied to and you jumped in with your only contribution about post history.
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
mint5 · 24 days ago
Noice, defending musks hitler salute.

Tesla is a meme stock and will one day explode like a game of hot potato.

Going online and defending every poor decision musk makes won’t change the reality that these days musk is a drugged out buffoon with a penchant for white nationalism who pays people to cheat at videos games for him.

His main selling point these days is how He has a loyal core group of cheerleaders that sticks with him no matter what. It’s prolonging the inevitable.

Sparyjerry · 24 days ago
Yep, he definitely was pledging allegiance to a long dead person while at the same time wearing a necklace honoring jews. yep. you got him.
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
mint5 · 25 days ago
Okay… well it was extensively reported like everywhere so I don’t know what you’ve been doing but it’s sure not reading the NYT, NPR, CBS or the similar.

Okay so you somehow haven’t seen any of the many many accounts of doge being extremely unreliable but today you’ve seen people tell you they are unreliable.

After hearing that, to you, surprising new info did you consider googling it or cross check it in anyway before replying?

have you so much as tried googling “are doge estimates reliable?” After hearing other people call them into question?

Anyway here’s the AI google summary for you to get you started:

Based on analyses of the "wall of receipts" posted by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in early 2025, their savings estimates are not considered reliable by budget experts, government contractors, and media outlets. Investigations have revealed that the claimed savings are heavily overstated, often misleading, and sometimes factually incorrect.

Sparyjerry · 24 days ago
DOGE already address all of those political hit piece articles. The claims made in them were spurious such as that they could not use the full amount of the contract. DOGE addressed this criticism by saying over 99% of contracts end up fulfilling their full amount. I'd be wary of what you read in the news especially when it relates to politics. Those news sites even thought Elon Musk was saluting a long dead genocidal maniac when he waved to the crowd - but specifically only Elon Musk and not any other person who made similar waves - why would that be?
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
GetTheFacts · 24 days ago
>okay? Why are you browsing my comment history lol

Why not? That's kind of the whole point of having accounts here on HN. To create an environment where folks can discuss stuff in good faith. Posting history is public because the posts were public in the first place and they represent who you are (or present yourself to be) on the site.

It allows each of us to be authentically 'us'. Do you not stand by the things you've posted in the past four plus years?

If you do, why do you care if people are looking at your posting history?

If you don't stand by what you've written here in the past, you're likely not posting in good faith.

Either way, why are you concerned about folks looking at the stuff you've publicly posted in the past?

Sparyjerry · 24 days ago
Do i seem concerned? You are the one whose only reply to my post was to my history rather than addressing the topic. I stand by all of those things, its just odd that you would be so concerned with that.
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
senordevnyc · 25 days ago
Sorry, too many blatant lies from Elon and co, I don't trust anything on their bullshit site.

lol, this is relevant: https://www.techdirt.com/2026/02/19/doge-bros-grant-review-p...

DOGE Bro’s Grant Review Process Was Literally Just Asking ChatGPT ‘Is This DEI?’

Fuck these unserious clowns.

Sparyjerry · 24 days ago
The article refers to the DOGE employees as "bros" and "chucklefucks" throughout and says things like "as far as i can tell" when describing their history. This is clearly biased and not a real article - more like a forum post from a 4channer.
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
senordevnyc · 25 days ago
I haven’t looked at it in almost a year, but was that the site that was full of basic errors and misleading info that was clearly designed to expose “waste, fraud, and abuse” that actually wasn’t any of those things? Yeah, I don’t know why we wouldn’t trust them…
Sparyjerry · 25 days ago
Most things are clearly linked to the contracts themselves with descriptions. Waste is a broad term and things like DEI or many more definitely fall into that category. Imagine spending billions of dollars on your HR department for the specific purposes of DEI without any tangible return on the investment. Its definitely wasteful and at most corruption. Discretionary funds for things like 'payroll' were being used to fund a very specific political ideology that aligned with one political party and congress did not authorize the use in that manner, which is why they were able to cut it so easily.
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
mint5 · 25 days ago
Please don’t cite doge itself as if it’s a reliable source.

Citing doge as a source shows that your viewpoint is built on provenly bad info.

And Frankly it’s insulting to HN readers that it’s being cited given how well published it was that their estimates were grossly inflated, unreliable, and kept trying to claim credit for cutting things that were already ended.

Sparyjerry · 25 days ago
Doge has not been proven unreliable anywhere I've seen, if you have data to show that please provide it. I have seen the kind of anti-doge news articles you are referring to but if you viewed the authors of those articles it was always folks who post entirely anti-elon or anti-republican articles like they are an attack ad placed by the democrat party and were debunked quickly.
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
wildrhythms · 25 days ago
Judging by your comment history, you might be Elon Musk's fiercest warrior!
Sparyjerry · 25 days ago
okay? Why are you browsing my comment history lol
Sparyjerry commented on DOGE Track   dogetrack.info/... · Posted by u/donohoe
ikeashark · 25 days ago
This websites seems incredibly biased and uses quite emotional language.
Sparyjerry · 25 days ago
Doge.gov already has the most transparent listing of everything they are cutting. This other website that starts out its header with "Tracking The Damage" is clearly a biased attempt by democrats to discredit a program that was started by republicans. It's actually kind of sad people don't realize that the two-party system involves tribalism where no matter how good something is, the other side will call it bad if it wasn't their idea.

u/Sparyjerry

KarmaCake day90November 27, 2021View Original