Readit News logoReadit News
Shaanie commented on Netflix to Acquire Warner Bros   about.netflix.com/en/news... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
embedding-shape · 22 days ago
> Combination Will Offer More Choice and Greater Value for Consumers, Create More Opportunities for the Creative Community and Generate Shareholder Value

No doubt about the last part, but how does merging two giants create "More Choice"? I know corporate double-speak is already out of control and I know they're writing whatever they can do avoid regulators who surely are looking into the acquisition, but surely these executives cannot believe acquisitions lead to more choice, right?

Shaanie · 22 days ago
More choice as in more content available to choose from on Netflix?
Shaanie commented on Ticker: Don't die of heart disease   myticker.com/... · Posted by u/colelyman
floundy · 2 months ago
“Alcoholism” is outdated and has been widely replaced by AUD (Alcohol Use Disorder).

I looked at Germany, according to Wikipedia the average consumption of pure ethanol per person per year in Germany as of 2019 was 12.2 liters. This was the 5th highest in the world, and equivalent to 686 standard 5% beers per year.

According to the WHO “moderate drinking” is 1 drink per day for women and 2 drinks per day for men, so the average German is already consuming above WHO guidelines.

It gets worse when you consider that about 1/4 of Germans don’t consume alcohol at all, and another 1/4 barely consume any, suggesting that the “average” isn’t really telling us much and the 70th, 80th, and 90th percentiles have very concerning consumption numbers. I assume most of those people consider themselves “social drinkers” but statistically they cannot be.

Shaanie · 2 months ago
The top 20% consumers consume a large majority of the alcohol, which means there are many Germans who consume reasonable amounts.
Shaanie commented on Ireland is making basic income for artists program permanent   artnews.com/art-news/news... · Posted by u/rbanffy
roboror · 2 months ago
>Precisely, people on the left wildly overestimate the admin overhead

Public or private? I've never seen "the left" criticize admin overhead in public services.

McKinsey estimates healthcare profit pools will reach $819 billion in 2027.

Shaanie · 2 months ago
They don't criticize it, but believe UBI will "almost pay for itself" by not requiring aa much overhead. Which it won't, not even remotely close.
Shaanie commented on ‘I witnessed war crimes’ in Gaza – former worker at GHF aid site [video]   bbc.com/news/videos/cy8k8... · Posted by u/nathanyz
asdefghyk · 5 months ago
Someone is in charge. The person who could release the hostages?
Shaanie · 5 months ago
It's entirely possible there's no longer any single person in charge in practice, but rather a bunch of more or less individually operating cells - each with their own leader.
Shaanie commented on Signs of autism could be encoded in the way you walk   sciencealert.com/signs-of... · Posted by u/amichail
rixed · 5 months ago
The baseline for human behavior is set by expectations. Some tens of thousand years ago we also had the instinct to savagely kill whoever lived in the nearby village.
Shaanie · 5 months ago
Did we though, or did we make a calculated decision that in a place with limited resources it'd be better for us to eliminate the competition?
Shaanie commented on Sleeping beauty Bitcoin wallets wake up after 14 years to the tune of $2B   marketwatch.com/story/sle... · Posted by u/aorloff
cyphertruck · 6 months ago
The traditional finance system is that a single central bank, owned by a cartel of rich banks- chase, jpm, etc-- issue the currency, charge us to use it and get first dibs on the benefits of monetary inflation -- google "cantillon effect".

The now much more diverse mining space is much better than completely centralized in one entity current system.

And bitcoin community has a way of working to fix weaknesses wherever they find it... there is active campaigns to diversify mining, as you pointed out those are pools-- and pools are being made obsolete. behind those pools are thousands or tens of thousands of mining operators, of all sizes, as it's viable at industrial as well as individual scale-- many use it to heat their house for less than the alternative, the earnings don't have to cover the full cost to be beneficial to people.

Shaanie · 6 months ago
FED is owned by private corporations?..
Shaanie commented on WhatsApp introduces ads in its app   nytimes.com/2025/06/16/te... · Posted by u/greenburger
whoisyc · 6 months ago
Thanks to Australian customer protection laws, Steam has some of the most lenient refund policies among digital software stores. You can usually get a full refund if your play time is less than a few hours. Plus there are frequent sales. Don’t underestimate the psychological impact of making people feel “I have to buy this now or the deal will be gone.”

I genuinely do not know how to get a refund from the google play store or the apple equivalent.

(The downside of the Steam policy is it makes Steam unviable for games that can be played in full very quickly. Develops can also game the system by dragging out early game so the player is over the refundable time by the time they reach the rough parts. But this is for another discussion.)

Shaanie · 6 months ago
There's no problem getting a refund for apps in my experience, I've done it a handful of times when I've changed my mind and it was easy and fully automated.
Shaanie commented on Dumb TVs deserve a comeback   makeuseof.com/reasons-why... · Posted by u/znpy
nitwit005 · a year ago
If it was purely competitive pressure, they'd be happy to let you pay extra to not have the ads.

Instead, they seem to make an effort to make sure no such model is available in stores. People have go hunt down display models intended for businesses, or never connect them to the internet, and display media from another device.

I suspect ultimately, they don't want to be manufacturers. They want control of a "platform" they can milk for infinite money, similar to what Facebook, Google, and friends have.

Shaanie · a year ago
I suspect it's not quite that simple. First, is there actually enough demand for ad-free TVs to make the option worth including? I personally probably wouldn't pay $20 to avoid ads in the home screen since those kind of ads are just a minor nuisance, which makes me question the size of the market for the ad-free option.

Second, what would the pricing be for the option?

If it's $10-20, that'd probably be fine, similar to what Amazon did for Kindle. But if it's more than that, then I bet the negative PR they would get for including the option outweighs the potential benefit to customers. "I would never buy an X, they're extremely greedy and want $50 just not to show ads. Crazy. I'll buy Y brand instead (which has ads but no 'corporate greed' option to not show them)".

Shaanie commented on Do bike lanes cause more traffic congestion? What the research says   cbc.ca/news/science/bike-... · Posted by u/aspenmayer
DemocracyFTW2 · a year ago
There being too many cars is a fact, there being too much money being spent to built infrastructure for cars only to the detriment of alternatives—rail, busses, bikes—is also a fact. Blaming cars is not blaming the 'other', it is pointing at the culprit.
Shaanie · a year ago
I believe you may be conflating opinion with fact, unless you add some qualifier like "based on potential throughput" or some such.
Shaanie commented on The richest people borrow against their stock (2021)   forbes.com/sites/johnhyat... · Posted by u/CHB0403085482
hackernewds · a year ago
transfer the basis to whom? better not inherit anything
Shaanie · a year ago
If I buy something for $10 and it's worth $10,000 when you inherit it, you should (obviously?) be taxed on the increase in value from $10 -> $10,000 if/when you sell. The purchase price shouldn't be "reset" to $10k.

It'sutterly insane to me that the step-up basis exists in the US, it's such an obvious loophole that can fairly easily be closed without many adverse effects.

In my country (Sweden) if you don't know the purchase price, you can use an approximate purchasing price (e.g. for equities you are allowed to assume that it was acquired for 20% of the current value, so you'd be taxed on 80%).

u/Shaanie

KarmaCake day607December 29, 2011
About
Swedish fintech developer/scrum master with an M.Sc.Eng.
View Original