Readit NewsYears later, I understand it was a complete folly. Removing Saddam in itself was good but what it did the wider region was not good.
So few are aware that Israel is and has been the largest recipient of US Foreign aid for decades, and the highest percentage - - - among any foreign aid recipient - - - goes right back into to lobbying (bribery) US politicians. Politicians don't cut off their "free money" stream . . .
And what’s the downside? More complex chemistry to make the cathode?
But what would you do with all the waste chlorine?
However, when we wanted to hire a new Ops person at work, the flood of obviously not qualified at all applicants we got was insane.
Ford invested heavily in an in-house, highly optimized production pathway for the Model T. Other manufacturers sourced a lot of their parts from vendors.
This gave the Model T a great advantage at first, but they had a lot more trouble than competitors in coming up with new models. Ford ended up converging with the rest of the industry in sourcing more of their parts externally.
The lack of new Tesla models makes me feel like a similar pivot is what Tesla needs. My suspicion is that they probably need a less terminally distracted Musk to pull it off.
I'd read somewhere that it was mainly because Henry Ford was dogmatic that the Model T was perfect, all the car anyone would ever need forever.
Yikes
It was for Netanyahu, and that's the important thing here.