Readit News logoReadit News

Dead Comment

PhantomGremlin commented on 1.7M Hondas are being investigated for phantom braking   arstechnica.com/cars/2022... · Posted by u/qualudeheart
asteroidp · 4 years ago
I would love to see the breakdown by age. When it was Toyotas fictitious problem it came down to a bunch of old people. People that shouldn't even have a license
PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
When it was Toyotas fictitious problem it came down to a bunch of old people.

Yeah, right. Blame it on "old people". Certainly not the code base with 10,000 global variables:

The design review found things like: Other egregious deviations from standard practice were the number of global variables in the system. (A variable is a location in memory that has a number in it. A global variable is any piece of software anywhere in the system can get to that number and read it or write it.) The academic standard is zero. Toyota had more than 10,000 global variables.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19613055 That original link is now broken. I don't think Toyota paid to scrub it, probably just decay.

PhantomGremlin commented on 1.7M Hondas are being investigated for phantom braking   arstechnica.com/cars/2022... · Posted by u/qualudeheart
kube-system · 4 years ago
I am not confusing anything. The system I describe was used, for instance, in several BMW models from the 1990s. It’s sucks and it disappeared fairly quickly, in lieu of the other much better systems you list.

See: http://www.eatsleeptinker.com/2014/06/02/asc-throttle-body-d...

PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
My biggest takeaway from that link is: BEVs can't get here fast enough. ICEs are too complicated.

But I should be careful what I wish for. Current BEVs have many user-hostile clown-car features.

PhantomGremlin commented on I tested four NVMe SSDs from four vendors – half lose FLUSH’d data on power loss   twitter.com/xenadu02/stat... · Posted by u/ahachete
yellowapple · 4 years ago
Per the title, four vendors were tested. Samsung was already mentioned as a non-loser, so it can't be one of the two losers (or else the title would be wrong and the SSDs would be from 3 vendors at most).
PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
Yeah you got me.

I didn't pay careful attention to the wording of the submitted title. I may have been confused because of the wording of the actual tweet: I tested a random selection of four NVMe SSDs from four vendors.

The word "random" meant to me that Samsung drives could have been selected twice. But, yes, then there wouldn't be four distinct vendors.

Unstated but implied by you is there are only two (major) Korean vendors to choose from.

So if Samsung is a Korean winner then Hynix must be the Korean loser. Which is now clear to me.

Is it possible there's a third (minor) Korean player? Could I possibly still have a chance? :)

PhantomGremlin commented on I tested four NVMe SSDs from four vendors – half lose FLUSH’d data on power loss   twitter.com/xenadu02/stat... · Posted by u/ahachete
yellowapple · 4 years ago
"Data loss occurred with a Korean and US brand, but it will turn into a whole "thing" if I name them so please forgive me."

This does a disservice to those who might be running drives from those vendors with an expectation that they don't lose data post-flush.

That said, this narrows one of the data losers down to Hynix. Curious about the other one, considering how many US-based SSD vendors there are.

PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
That said, this narrows one of the data losers down to Hynix.

Not really. Samsung builds a plethora of SSDs.

PhantomGremlin commented on C Portability Lessons from Weird Machines   begriffs.com/posts/2018-1... · Posted by u/rsecora
PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
the MIPS R3000 processor ... raises an exception for signed integer overflow, unlike many other processors which silently wrap to negative values.

Too bad programmer laziness won and most current hardware doesn't support this.

As a teenager I remember getting hit by this all the time in assembly language programming for the IBM S/360. (FORTRAN turned it off).

   S0C8 Fixed-point overflow exception
When you're a kid you just do things quickly. This was the machine's way of slapping you upside your head and saying: "are you sure about that?"

PhantomGremlin commented on Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)   chromium.woolyss.com/f/HT... · Posted by u/thyrox
zelphirkalt · 4 years ago
> In conclusion, contrary to your JS experience, I'd say that I spend over 90% of my time browsing w/o JS and am happy with my experience. Things are lightning fast and I see few or no ads. I don't need an ad blocker since 99% of ads just don't happen w/o JS.

Well, you still have lots of tracking stuff loaded probably, unless you got something extra for blocking trackers. A tracking pixels does not need JS. A font loading from CSS does not need JS. Personally I dislike those too, so I would still recommend using a blocker for those.

PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
Well, you still have lots of tracking stuff loaded probably, unless you got something extra for blocking trackers.

Yes I'm sure I have that stuff loaded. But I don't care because it's quite ephemeral:

I exit Firefox multiple times a day, there's really no performance cost to doing that after every group of websites. E.g. if, while reading HN, I look up something on Wikipedia, or I search with Bing or Google, everything goes away together.

In my settings: delete cookies and site data when Firefox is closed

In my settings: clear history when Firefox closes, everything goes except browsing and download history

No suggestions except for bookmarks.

So when I restart Firefox to then browse reddit it starts with a clean slate.

Comcast insisted I purchase a DOCSIS3 modem quite a while ago. Once downloads are at 100 mpbs+, does it really matter if I repeatedly re-download a few items to cache?

The only noticeable downside is when I switch to Safari to view something that needs JS, I then see ads for clothing that my wife and daughters might be interested in. I presume this is due to fallback to tracking via IP address. Of course I always clear history and empty caches in Safari.

Obviously this doesn't work for someone who wants to or needs to keep 100 browser windows open at once, for months at a time. But that's not me. I don't think that way, never have.

Edit: just had to add that sites like Wikipedia are better w/o JS (unless you edit?). I don't see those annoying week-long pleas for money. Do they still do those?

PhantomGremlin commented on Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)   chromium.woolyss.com/f/HT... · Posted by u/thyrox
ComodoHacker · 4 years ago
Doesn't exactly this behavior create echo chambers and lead to polarization?
PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
I usually do read the linked content but I agree with GP poster that comments are often more informative.

Yes there is sometimes an echo chamber here, but it's only for limited topics. It very much has a Silicon Valley feel to it, but @dang and I have gone around on this and he assures us that the readership and comments have broad geographic representation.[1] It's a worldwide echo chamber. :)

Fortunately the echo chamber doesn't exist for most submissions. Most of the discussion on HN is on non-polarizing topics.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26869902

PhantomGremlin commented on Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)   chromium.woolyss.com/f/HT... · Posted by u/thyrox
mderazon · 4 years ago
I don't know which web you're viewing that only needs JS for 3-5% of websites
PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
HN totally usable for basic functionality w/o JS.

profootballtalk.com works great if you don't want to vote or comment

macrumors.com great functionality

nitter.net happily takes the place of twitter.com

drudgereport.com works great and I rarely turn on JS when I go to the sites he links to, usually the text on target sites is there if not as pretty as it could be

individual subreddits (e.g. old.reddit.com/r/Portland/ ) are quite good w/o JS. But the "old." is probably important.

I admit that there are lots of sites that don't work, e.g. /r/IdiotsInCars/ doesn't work because reddit uses JS for video. For so many sites the text is there but images and videos aren't. Also need to turn off "page style" for some recalcitrant sites.

In conclusion, contrary to your JS experience, I'd say that I spend over 90% of my time browsing w/o JS and am happy with my experience. Things are lightning fast and I see few or no ads. I don't need an ad blocker since 99% of ads just don't happen w/o JS.

PhantomGremlin commented on Google Tag Manager, the new anti-adblock weapon (2020)   chromium.woolyss.com/f/HT... · Posted by u/thyrox
zwaps · 4 years ago
Crazy how evil Google is. Just wow.

Since this runs entirely on the domain of the website, it can easily ignore your privacy rights, with Google more or less washing their hands clean of it.

Indeed, if we take blocking trackers as expression of consent, the only possible reason this exists at all is to illegally circumvent privacy preferences.

In other words, if you work for Google, you are literally working for a criminal organization. How times have changed.

It seems the only possible option to retain privacy rights given to us by law (eg in the EU) is to disable JavaScript and cycle IPs or other fingerprinting features. None of that is realistic.

As a EU citizen, i hope that our ineffectual administration at least tries to fight this somehow. Of course, there is little hope.

PhantomGremlin · 4 years ago
Crazy how evil Google is. Just wow.

Yeah, but there are a lot of employees there who check their bank accounts twice a month and say: "Just wow".

Venial evil is easily bought.

Edit:

As a EU citizen

I really hate to even say this, but "Crazy Vlad" nearby is what true evil is about.

u/PhantomGremlin

KarmaCake day2984May 15, 2013View Original