Readit NewsAdding to the list of reasons to dislike him, there's him trying to get a lawyer who interviewed him for the SEC fired from his new unrelated job.
Israeli government has Arab list in it, with Arab ministers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Arab_List
Not the parliament - the government itself. This is by definition not an apartheid state.
This law denying citizenship is to block a loophole used by known terrorists to come into Israel and explode Jews on busses. Here are some examples for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_HaSharon_Mall_suicide_bom...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sbarro_restaurant_suicide_bomb...
Why should Israelis allow a terrorist loophole in? Would you allow a way for terrorists to kill you and your family in your home country? I didn't think so.
In addition, the article notes that several supported of the law (at least one who's in Knesset) claim that the invention is for Israel to maintain its "Jewish character".
Would that not be legal, as long as my software doesn't contain pieces of the original book copied verbatim?
Same thing here, if the modifications were happening on the server side and then sent to your browser that's probably not legal
Germany......79
UK...........46
Sweden.......36
Canada.......36
Netherlands..23
France.......21
USA..........17
It's mostly that the US homeless population concentrates in very few areas.
> How do you reconcile that with the fact that there are so many simple jobs with open positions everywhere?
I have friends who have tried to hire homeless for help with moving because her movers did not show up. The experience did not go well. She basically had to babysit them to the effect of "Ok, pack up that box. Now take it and come with me. [he follows without box] No, lets go back and get the box..." But for everything.
Even among the set of homeless who want to do jobs, many need extraordinary supervision, and most places are not staffed well enough to handle that.
Breaking down the Swedish stats, of the reported 34000, the source says:
"4 500 people were in acute homelessness, of which 280 were sleeping rough. 5 600 people received institutional care or lived in different forms of category housing. 13 900 people lived in long-term housing solutions (the secondary housing market), provided by the social services in the municipalities. 6 800 persons lived in short-term insecure housing solutions that they had organized themselves."
Unfortunately the original source isn't archived so I haven't checked the exact definitions used here.
For the US numbers, we have:
"On a single night in 2018, roughly 553,000 people were experiencing homelessness in the United States. About two-thirds (65%) were staying in sheltered locations—emergency shelters or transitional housing programs—and about one-third (35%) were in unsheltered locations such as on the street"
I'll assume you'll get similar discrepancies for all of the other countries.
So? does that automatically imply that it does not feel pain?
>What science generally understands under pain and suffering plants simply don't have.
Listen, I don't buy the science say this and science say that kind of arguments. ANY living being ( assuming we can settle for what can be called 'alive') will have a mechanism for self preservation, pain is one of them. The onus is on 'science' or people to prove otherwise.
Neither of these are applicable to plants, so there doesn't seem to be any evolutionary reason to evolve pain receptors.
At 10 billion light years away from the most distant lens it is 100% certain that they are no longer in a gravitational lensing configuration.
For a frame of reference, the Milky Way will be in the middle of its epic merger with Andromeda in about 5 billion years.