It's not like US tech giants have much competition to fear from European companies anyway. A 3% price increase isn't going to get anyone to switch to another service (except maybe in the case of Amazon's physical sales).
In the end, consumers would pay and this would add to the already large price difference between the EU and the US, due to the much higher applicable VAT in the EU, as well as other similar taxes applied in some EU countries (private copying levy [0], eco-participation [1]...).
We don't pay for Google with money but with our privacy. I'm perfectly fine with making my privacy more expensive to buy for Google.
That will solve absolutely NOT A SINGLE ISSUE , but it’s just another income to feed the bureaucracy.
Thanks to the three countries that stopped this madness.
PS : i also find it outrageous that gafa don’t pay taxes, but let’s fix the tax heavens in Europe then. Don’t start making special taxes on revenue ffs.
EDIT : changed "income" to revenue.
Google cannot get rid of the EU market, if it does, EU competitors might have a chance. So the EU can just tax Google as much as it wants. What are we to be afraid of ? Google leaving EU ? Please do ! This will only gives us a chance to come we our own solution to the web Google&FB think they invented.
I don't get how we could not be glad that we tax more those dystopian companies. Google, FB, etc... don't respect any values of privacy and freedom, they should not have even the right to do what they do in EU and GDPR is step in the right direction for that.
The only problem is that we have no weight if we don't act together, so if some European countries are too short-sighted and put their self little short term interest above the rest and prefer offer encourage Google's development, then yes we will fail.
It's only open source if you build it yourself from Github
- Backed by webrender : Mozilla is putting large effort in webrender and Azul leverage all this work by using it as a backend. Too early to say, but it can potentially be far more performant than QT or GTK
- the "modern" way people do UI : you have Dom diffing backed-in like React (and like Flutter)
- backed-in data binding
- (live) CSS styling which is a subset of web CSS
- SVG support
- Extendable : you can use OpenGL to draw to a texture and pass it to Azul for display. This will allow for integration of 3D renderer, 2D renderer (for e.g Azul SVG drawing is using this mechanism), etc...
I'll definitely follow the progress with a lot of attention. I personally would prefer Azul so much more to GTK/QT/Flutter for developing apps
- Backed by webrender : Mozilla is putting large effort in webrender and Azul leverage all this work by using it as a backend. Too early to say, but it can potentially be far more performant than QT or GTK
- the "modern" way people do UI : you have Dom diffing backed-in like React (and like Flutter)
- backed-in data binding
- (live) CSS styling which is a subset of web CSS
- SVG support
- Extendable : you can use OpenGL to draw to a texture and pass it to Azul for display. This will allow for integration of 3D renderer, 2D renderer (for e.g Azul SVG drawing is using this mechanism), etc...
I'll definitely follow the progress with a lot of attention. I personally would prefer Azul so much more to GTK/QT/Flutter for developing apps
This is my first rust project, so I'm not sure if I would be any help
I also think it's better to have as much GUI part as possible in typescript, try-and-refine cycle is shorter and imagine how it could be with live/hot-reload
What I'm trying to do is something like electron but lighter, faster and memory-savvy. I think it could use azul, so thanks a lot :-)
It can currently show a window and render moving rect from vue.js template. There's still a lot of work to be done, webrender does too little to be just drop in replacement for electron but it might be worth watching if you're interested in anything like that (lightweight cross-platform opengl-rendered gui apps developed in react/vue/angular/...)
"The software may collect information about you and your use of the software, and send that to Microsoft. Microsoft may use this information to provide services and improve our products and services. You may opt-out of many of these scenarios, but not all, as described in the product documentation."