I'm curious, what would you personally consider to be a step too far in the fight against CSAM?
Readit NewsMrNeon commented on The Going Dark initiative or ProtectEU is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt mastodon.online/@mullvadn... · Posted by u/janandonly
MrNeon commented on The disguised return of EU Chat Control reclaimthenet.org/the-dis... · Posted by u/egorfine
I guessed the term Chat Control had to be made up by opponents of the legislation, so searched for the real name.
The official name of the legislation is:
“Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse” (COM/2022/209 FINAL).
It is often referenced more simply as the “Child Sexual Abuse Regulation” (CSA Regulation).
How Could You Possibly Be Against This?!?!? Regulation
It is likely you use Chrome or a browser that uses Blink for its engine and the OP uses a non-blink browser like Firefox. I use Firefox and I can cofirm since the last few months Youtube usability borders on usable
I use Firefox with uBlock and besides a couple of times where video start was delayed by a few seconds it has been working as well as before.
Word is awful too, it messes up formatting, especially when pasting images. Good luck writing anything longer than couple pages. Hasn't been solved in 20 years. Have stopped using word 2 years ago but I am gonna assume it's still an issue
Section breaks keep the formatting changes from affecting the previous/following content so you can place and format images as you wish.
It is not mistake. It is common tactic to make illusion of improvement.
I've seen that sentiment on reddit as well and I can't phantom how you think it being on purpose is more likely than a mistake when
1 - The error is so blatantly large
2 - There is a graph without error right next to it
3 - The errors are not there in the system card and the presentation page
We still need to see those demos in action though. That's the big IF where everyone is thinking about
Sure but "Also the the sora videos are proven to be modified ads" is demonstrably false, for the demos OpenAI shared and the artist made ones.
https://futurism.com/the-byte/openai-sora-demohttps://old.reddit.com/r/vfx/comments/1cuj360/turns_out_that...
here is the link. The balloon video had heavy editing involved.
Oh, so not the actual demo videos OpenAI shared on their website and twitter.
Also the the sora videos are proven to be modified ads. We still need to see how it perform first
> Also the the sora videos are proven to be modified ads
Can't find anything about that, you got a link?
MrNeon commented on Midjourney web experience is now open to everyone midjourney.com/... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
MJ coomers? The same MJ that bans accounts for coomer content?
Not sure that will change just because of a new frontend.
None of these are impressive in the least. Anything I have heard from Udio is basically trash. It is the AI art equivalent of synthetic cats and pretty face shots. Who cares.
What is ultimately going to be undefeated is training your own model.
> What is ultimately going to be undefeated is training your own model.
From scratch?