can you build a single .exe standalone app or standalone installer ? i only see folders or .exes relying on buind in the same folder is the archive
Readit NewsJgoauh commented on Electrobun v1: Build fast, tiny, and cross-platform desktop apps with TypeScript blackboard.sh/blog/electr... · Posted by u/merlindru
do you think using webassembly (.wasm) for non UI related code might help with client side performance for apps where server side work is less applicable ?
its up !
Jgoauh commented on Claude's new constitution anthropic.com/news/claude... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
And if you think the US maintaining the ability to go to war is a bad thing, I don't want you in charge of regulating AI or running the country.
Hi, i don't often reply to attacks of character but judging by your comment history you have a habit to leave a lot of them, i would probably be a bad president tho, because i don't think its possible to be good at running a bad system, and because i don't think its a good thing for a single person to "run a country".
I don't think my concerns over over Anthropic's honesty should be dismissed based on your perception on my capacity at doing something else.
I also don't see how DoD contracts help Anthropic's goal of "avoiding actions that are inappropriately dangerous or harmful", i also don't see the practical use of a constitution that doesn't see the contradiction. I will not answer to your following comments because you don't seem to be a nice person, goodbye.
Jgoauh commented on Claude's new constitution anthropic.com/news/claude... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
* Anthropic accepted a 200M contract from the US Department of Defence
* Anthropic seeked contracts from the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, the leaked memo acknowledges that the contracts will enrich dictators
* Anthropic spent more than 2 millions of political lobying in 2025
* "Unfortunately, I think ‘No bad person should ever benefit from our success’ is a pretty difficult principle to run a business on."
I don't see how this new constitution is anything more than marketing, when "enriching dictators is better than going out of business" is your CEO's motto, "lets to the lest evil thing that sill gives us more power and money" is not new, and its not gonna fix anything. When the economic system is fucked, only a reimagining of the system can fix it. Good intentions cannot meaningfully change anything when comming from actors that operate from within the fucked system, and who pay millions to fuck it further
https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/clients/summary...https://www.lobbyfacts.eu/datacard/anthropic-pbc?rid=5112273...
Jgoauh commented on Indifference is a power (2015) aeon.co/essays/why-stoici... · Posted by u/suioir
Do you think that therapy will lead to a better outcome for those men than following stoic practices?
They're not following stoic practices, they're rebranding alpha-havingemotionsisforwomen-broness as stoicism, and yes therapy leads to better outcomes then this, fight club came out 26 years ago get with the program
"Do you really think going to therapy will lead to a better outcome for Tyler Durden than following regular exercise and community with his friends ?" this is what you sound like
Dead Comment
Jgoauh commented on European Commission issues call for evidence on open source lwn.net/Articles/1053107/... · Posted by u/pabs3
wow you caught me
Jgoauh commented on European Commission issues call for evidence on open source lwn.net/Articles/1053107/... · Posted by u/pabs3
Today, we take the term "open source" for granted, but this wasn't always the case. There wasn't a single, universally accepted term to describe software that was freely shareable. "Free software" was one of the terms used, but it wasn't clear to non-programmers how this was different from proprietary software that was downloadable without having to pay for it. If you're not a programmer anyway, how should one type of "free software" be different from another?
Proponents of what we now call "open source" wanted to distinguish between two senses of the word "free". One sense is not having to pay for something, as in "Come over to my party, the beer is free." Anther sense is "I can criticize the government, because the country I live in is free." People in the free software and open source movement began to phrase the dichotomy in these terms to illustrate how one sense of the word "free" is much more important than the other. The fact that you don't have to pay for some piece of software is nice, but what's more important is that you aren't beholden to the company that developed it.
thanks this is very clear !