Readit News logoReadit News
IMTDb commented on Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban   reuters.com/legal/litigat... · Posted by u/chirau
heresie-dabord · 6 days ago
> the social media companies have such a grip on their kids

We are talking about US companies in particular. Everything that was being done to try to mitigate the vileness and toxicity has been forcefully rescinded in the name of US profiteering.

There is only one viable option, and that it for countries that reject poisonous US social media to choose/identify/build a better platform that is safe for children, safe for news and information, and safe for society and for Democracy itself.

IMTDb · 6 days ago
I know few countries that reject poisonous US social media in favor of better platform that is safe for children, safe for news and information, and safe for society and for Democracy itself: the peoples democracy of North Korea, the democratic republic of Iran, the not authoritarian society of Russia, etc

I see tremendous correlation between restriction of access to some websites and straight up dictatorship that pretend to protect it's population from the evils of foreign influences.

IMTDb commented on State of AI: An Empirical 100T Token Study with OpenRouter   openrouter.ai/state-of-ai... · Posted by u/anjneymidha
syspec · 12 days ago
According to the report, 52% of all open-source AI is used for *roleplaying*. They attribute it to fewer content filters and higher creativity.

I'm pretty surprised by that, but I guess that also selects for people who would use openrouter

IMTDb · 12 days ago
Or maybe it’s just strange classification. I see a lot of prompts on the internet looking like “act as a senior xxx expert with over 15 years of industry experience and answer the following: [insert simple question]”

I hope those are not classified as “roleplaying” the “roleplay” here is just a trick to get better answer from the model, often in a professional setting that has nothing to do with creative writing of NSFW stuff

IMTDb commented on We're losing our voice to LLMs   tonyalicea.dev/blog/were-... · Posted by u/TonyAlicea10
Frieren · 20 days ago
> But if picturing that guy running the show feels like a disaster, then let’s be honest: the issue isn’t the absence of regulation, it’s the desire to force the world into your preferred shape.

For example, we can forbid corporations usage of algorithms beyond sorting by date of the post. Regulation could forbid gathering data about users, no gender, no age, no all the rest of things.

> Calling it “regulation” is just a polite veneer over wanting control.

It is you that may have misinterpreted what regulations are.

IMTDb · 20 days ago
> or example, we can forbid corporations usage of algorithms beyond sorting by date of the post

Hacker News sorted by "new" is far less valuable to me than the default homepage which has a sorting algorithm that has a good balance between freshness and impact. Please don't break it.

> It is you that may have misinterpreted what regulations are.

The definition of regulation is literally: "a rule or directive made and maintained by an authority." I am just scared about who the authority is going to be.

IMTDb commented on We're losing our voice to LLMs   tonyalicea.dev/blog/were-... · Posted by u/TonyAlicea10
Lapel2742 · 20 days ago
> it's how the algorithms promote engagement.

They are destroying our democratic societies and should be heavily regulated. The same will become true for AI.

IMTDb · 20 days ago
> should be heavily regulated.

By who, exactly? It’s easy to call for regulation when you assume the regulator will conveniently share your worldview. Try the opposite: imagine the person in charge is someone whose opinions make your skin crawl. If you still think regulation beats the status quo, then the call for regulation is warranted, but be ready to face the consequences.

But if picturing that guy running the show feels like a disaster, then let’s be honest: the issue isn’t the absence of regulation, it’s the desire to force the world into your preferred shape. Calling it “regulation” is just a polite veneer over wanting control.

IMTDb commented on Europe is scaling back GDPR and relaxing AI laws   theverge.com/news/823750/... · Posted by u/ksec
palata · a month ago
Yes, that's what I meant.

Also businesses are not people. People may not do illegal things "just because they are illegal" or because they want to be "good" (e.g. I agree that we should not litter, I wouldn't even need a regulation for that).

Businesses are profit-maximising machines. If it it profitable to litter, a business will do it. The framework in which businesses maximise is set by regulations, which represent what society wants. That's how capitalism works.

The limit of capitalism is when businesses are more powerful than the entities in charge of enforcing the regulations. If "enforcing a regulation" means having lawyers work on it, but the businesses themselves have orders of magnitudes more lawyers trying to prevent those entities from doing their jobs, then we have a problem. That's a limit of capitalism, IMO.

IMTDb · a month ago
I still believe that even with a reject all button, the regulation is absolute bullshit. The sheer fact that the regulation forbids that setting to be done at the browser level (the law specifically mentions that the consent - or rejection - has to be specific for each website and thus cannot be "once and forget"), is absolute dogshit.

I turn out to be the CTO of a mid-sized SAAS business (100+ FTE over 3 continents), and neither I, any legal advisor, or any other C-level that I have ever met are discussing "what's the fine ? should we just pay instead of complying ?" when dealing with legal stuff. I do not know who brainwashed you into thinking that all businesses are just gonna disregard any regulation given the chance but that has not been my experience at all. I am not saying that none are doing it, but this really isn't the norm. The whole "people = good, business = bad" is just some kind of cozy metal construction that fits in a TikTok video, but that not how the world works.

IMTDb commented on Europe is scaling back GDPR and relaxing AI laws   theverge.com/news/823750/... · Posted by u/ksec
palata · a month ago
I don't get why people conclude from the cookie hell that "regulations are bad". If those goddamn websites got actual fines for those dark patterns, they wouldn't do it. The EU should just be stricter with the regulations.
IMTDb · a month ago
I m not sure I follow your logic; are you saying that the regulation is not that bad because you are not fined enough if you don't follow it ? Some of us just follow regulations because it's the law - regardless of the fine. I feel like we should be allowed to express our opinion about their merits or shortcomings without considering the penalty aspect which is an entirely separate conversation.
IMTDb commented on French ex-president Sarkozy begins jail sentence   bbc.com/news/articles/cvg... · Posted by u/begueradj
adev_ · 2 months ago
Question: Since when a random Union is representative of the political opinions of an entire profession ?

Spoiler: They never are.

Specially in France.

Even CGT, the biggest union in the country is currently a perfect good example of that.

CGT is loud. They are often extreme in there political opinions, regularly promoting extreme left ideology, some group historically had even close ties with the communists.... And they represent statistically nobody.

They represent less than 10% of people in France because this is currently the percentage of the unionized worker in the country.

IMTDb · 2 months ago
They represent the political opinion of people who are affiliated with them. Once you getting involved in organizations that have a clear and defined political agenda; your whole argument that "nothing you do would ever be politically oriented" and that you are "fully neutral in all situation" becomes incredibly weak.

I am sure some "juge d'instruction" try their very best to be as neutral as possible. Some ostensibly aren't even giving this a flying fuck but both are repeating the same "we are non-political" any time they get the chance. When I hear this, I am unable to know if the person if of the first kind or the second kind. There seems to be 0 investigation internally to weed out the liars which thus casts shadow on the entire profession.

Trust is hard-earned, easily lost, and difficult to reestablish. This scandal touched the very essence of the French judicial system, yet had no major repercussion on the internal organization and processes of those "Juges d'Instruction". It's just business as usual. So until they come up with new systems to ensure better attempt at neutrality and they remove the people that have obviously been plaguing the system for years, it's normal and healthy that any mention of "neutrality" is immediately met with heavy skepticism.

IMTDb commented on Uv is the best thing to happen to the Python ecosystem in a decade   emily.space/posts/251023-... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
IMTDb · 2 months ago
Usually when someone comes with that argument, I ask them to pick any week date in the past year and then I take a random item on my calendar on that day; I give them the time and address of where I need to be as well as the address of my home and I ask them how long it's going to take me and how much it's going to cost. That's usually enough to bring them down a notch from "train work" to "sometimes train work". (But they tend to forget very often, they need to be reminded regularly for some reason). Do you want to play that game with me to get your reality check in order ?

Western Europe in a VERY dense city BTW.

IMTDb commented on French ex-president Sarkozy begins jail sentence   bbc.com/news/articles/cvg... · Posted by u/begueradj
adev_ · 2 months ago
> It's also worth noting that members of the second system

Nope. This picture was found in the office of an Union related to "magistrats".

Magistrats is a broad term that also include Procureurs, Judges but also some Lawyers.

The union is not specifically associated to the position of "Juge d'instruction" by any means.

But yes, generally speaking Politicians do not like Magistrats and Magistrats do not like politicians in France. And honestly, it is more healthy like that.

IMTDb · 2 months ago
> Magistrats is a broad term that also include Procureurs, Judges but also some Lawyers.

The also is key: "Juge d'instructions" absolutely are "Magistrats" - just like Procureurs, etc are. Some of those "Juge d'instructions" are part of this union who put a target on the back of some politicians. How can they claim with a straight face that they are not biased ?

Either they know it's bullshit and they are simply lying; or they really believe their claims and they are just delusional. I don't know which one I prefer.

IMTDb commented on Internet's biggest annoyance: Cookie laws should target browsers, not websites   nednex.com/en/the-interne... · Posted by u/SweetSoftPillow
rustc · 2 months ago
> OR they acknowledge that it's almost impossible to build a website without some form of tracking

Why would it be almost impossible to "build a website" without tracking?

IMTDb · 2 months ago
Why doesn't the EU do it ?

u/IMTDb

KarmaCake day3041December 25, 2012View Original