https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/3966/
One probe, Parker I assume, goes through all the planetary flybys to achieve its solar orbit. The other just drops into an even closer solar orbit. Why not do that for both probes?
Amazon seems hostile to this very idea, that I know what I want, will spend 15% more to have it tomorrow and will not by the random stuff it smashes in the search results because I know what I want.
I bet those antennas can be tiled more efficiently with triangles.
Apple “You clicked a pop up that said you accepted random shutdowns and reboots due to a degraded battery instead of allowing us to degrade performance to enable a stable experience with a degraded battery.”
How would you explain the above to tech illiterate people? Increase suppose calls because you allowed a user to chose between degraded yet stable performance versus seemly random (to the user) reboots and shutdowns?
That would be transparent and also allow decisions, if AppleCare also allowed for free battery replacement after receiving that message it would be a PR boon, not a kerfuffle.
One thing that rarely discussed in this kind of conversation is taxes. A doctor spends 12 years earning next to nothing and going into debt for training costs. Then the second they start making a real doctor salary, the IRS thinks they are 'rich'. They are taxed at the highest tax bracket even though it might take them another 10 years to surpass someone who was earning barely a six-figure salary the whole time.
If you spend 9 years earning nothing and then make $1M in your tenth year, you will pay much more taxes than someone earning $100K for 10 years (even though both earned a total of $1M over those 10 years).
I can entirely see the military perspective though, this is almost a direct challenge for any adversary that any maneuver you perform, we will know about it.