Readit News logoReadit News
GGByron commented on If you're going to vibe code, why not do it in C?   stephenramsay.net/posts/v... · Posted by u/sramsay
GGByron · 3 months ago
None of these articles explain what "vibecoding" is, and on general principles I refuse to look it up.
GGByron commented on Twenty Eighth International Obfuscated C Code Contest   ioccc.org/2024/index.html... · Posted by u/mdl_principle
AlotOfReading · 7 months ago
You can write similarly obscure code in any language. C is a particularly good language for it, but many of the entries use techniques that are broadly applicable to others.
GGByron · 7 months ago
> "C is a particularly good language for it"

A particularly good language for writing bad code? Quite the euphemism.

GGByron commented on Censorship is quietly deciding which games you can buy   items.gog.com/freedomtobu... · Posted by u/HelloUsername
GGByron · 7 months ago
"Censorship is quietly deciding which games you can buy"

What an asinine sentence.

GGByron commented on Twenty Eighth International Obfuscated C Code Contest   ioccc.org/2024/index.html... · Posted by u/mdl_principle
GGByron · 7 months ago
I can't imagine a better argument against using c. Isn't that the obvious, serious takeaway?
GGByron commented on Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA   open-web-advocacy.org/blo... · Posted by u/yashghelani
stockresearcher · 8 months ago
Even if you get past the roadblocks Apple has put in place, it’s not beer and skittles for browser makers in the EU.

The CRA, which is now in effect, lists browsers as class I important products. Technical documentation, design documentation, user documentation, security conformance testing, a declared support period at the time of download, software bill of materials, the legal obligation to respond to and make all your internal documents available to market surveillance organizations, etc.

And if the EU doesn’t publish harmonized development standards by 2027, you will be required to pay a 3rd party to come in and analyze you, your design, and the security of your browser, and make a report to send to the market surveillance organization, who gets to decide if you have the requisite conformance.

Are you sure that anyone but the big boys want to make a browser in the EU?

Here is the law, please point out where I am wrong. Much appreciated :)

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L...

GGByron · 8 months ago
> "Are you sure that anyone but the big boys want to make a browser in the EU?"

Surely that's the point - a collusive oligopoly making end runs around the "free market". Just look at all the other replies, rich with apologia.

GGByron commented on Rules of good writing (2007)   dilbertblog.typepad.com/t... · Posted by u/santiviquez
LoganDark · 8 months ago
There probably is. For me receiving the subject after anything else requires me to buffer everything else awaiting the subject in order to parse it correctly. My brain seems to naturally work in cause->effect order so it's naturally easiest for me to process the cause first and then the effect. I don't think everyone works the same way, but there is definitely an order of information flow that is most efficient for me. I also generally seem to process things somewhat like an LLM would...
GGByron · 8 months ago
"My brain seems to naturally work in cause->effect order"

You must be Jesus. Most brains observe events first and use that information to reason about their causes.

GGByron commented on Rules of good writing (2007)   dilbertblog.typepad.com/t... · Posted by u/santiviquez
jameshart · 8 months ago
I think the counterargument to this simplistic assertion is that "The boy was hit by a ball" seems equally legible to me to "A ball hit the boy". If you're quickly reporting the details of an accident to a doctor and it's crucial to get the information across quickly, I think many speakers would still start with "He was hit by a ball", not "A ball hit him." We're not interested in assigning agency to the ball here, we're interested in the effects on the boy. We're focusing down on the boy first, then talking about what is happening. Is he hitting a ball? Getting hit by a ball? Nobody cares what the ball's doing, it doesn't need to be prepped for surgery.
GGByron · 8 months ago
"I think many speakers would still start with "He was hit by a ball", not "A ball hit him." We're not interested in assigning agency to the ball here, we're interested in the effects on the boy."

And you don't favor the shorter message?

GGByron commented on Rules of good writing (2007)   dilbertblog.typepad.com/t... · Posted by u/santiviquez
GGByron · 8 months ago
"The main technique is keeping things simple."

Orwell also knew to avoid clichés, and lo, he made a much stronger argument for simplicity in his essays. "Keep it simple" means nothing by itself and Adams does not explain the concepts he hints at or even call them by their proper names.

None of the above would seem obnoxious had he actually cited Orwell.

GGByron commented on What does it mean that MP3 is free?   idiallo.com/blog/listen-m... · Posted by u/foxfired
teractiveodular · a year ago
They don't. You now subscribe to Copilot 365 or whatever the hell Office is called today for the low, low price of $12.99 per month for the rest of your life.
GGByron · a year ago
I'm sure that's also an option but I'm looking at their website right now and it says I can own this warmed-over text editor outright for 179$. What a bargain.
GGByron commented on Ingesting PDFs and why Gemini 2.0 changes everything   sergey.fyi/articles/gemin... · Posted by u/serjester
GGByron · a year ago
I've not followed the literature very closely for some time - what problem are they trying to solve in the first place? They write "for documents to be effectively used in RAG pipelines, they must be split into smaller, semantically meaningful chunks". Segmenting each page by paragraphs doesn't seem like a particularly hard vision problem, nor do I see why an OCR system would need to incorporate an LLM (which seem more like a demonstration of overfitting than a "language model" in any literal sense, going by ChatGPT). Perhaps I'm just out of the loop.

Finally, I must point out that statements in the vein of "Why [product] 2.0 Changes Everything" are more often than not a load of humbug.

u/GGByron

KarmaCake day3February 6, 2025View Original