There's very little decision making in the game: You don't choose battle rewards, they are forced onto you, you get only one reroll that rerolls the entire triplet. Choosing the path is choosing between fighting an elite or not, and between visiting something different than normal battle encounter or not. Only the shop allows for some strategy. On the plus side, everything worked for the most part on Firefox, except when I decided to pass an item as inheritance, it wasn't passed.
Readit NewsEtherlord87 commented on Show HN: Reel Rogue – A browser roguelike (idler) about manipulating the odds alt-qq.com/... · Posted by u/qq-niklas
This is called "boomerang theory" in sociology
> The imperial boomerang is the theory that governments that develop repressive techniques to control colonial territories will eventually deploy those same techniques domestically against their own citizens.
This is different from what parent post describes. Parent means developing tools by one side of a barricade, that the other may eventually use against them, e.g. when the power shifts to them. Whereas you speak about developing the tools to be used abroad, but those tools eventually also get used domestically, but the administrator remains the same.
What is up with this comment, is it bot-spam? What are the citations [7] and [2] supposed to be?
It's a quote from the submission (Wikipedia article).
- AI can grow corn
- Yes it can
- Prove it
- AI, tell me instructions to grow corn
- Go buy seeds, plant them, water the field and once you gather the corn report back
- I'm back with the corn, proving AI can grow corn!
This is the experiment here, with nuance added to it. The thing is, though, if you "orchestrate" other people, you might as well do it with a single sentence as I described. Or you can manage more thoroughly. Some decisions you make may actually be detrimental to the end result.
So the only meaningful experiment would be to test a bot against a human being: who earns more money orchestrating the corn farm, a bot or a human? Consider also the expenses which is electricity/water for a bot and also food, medicine etc. for a human being.
Etherlord87 commented on Are we all plagiarists now? economist.com/culture/202... · Posted by u/pseudolus
What would be high enough? I agree 90% isn't perfect, but neither are LLMs.
What can you do with 90%? Accuse people of plagiarism and ignore the fact you will hurt 10% of innocent people, while still allowing 10% of cheaters? Of course there's ambiguity in the "accuracy" term, but I assumed you can be inaccurate in both directions.
Etherlord87 commented on Why Is Greenland Part of the Kingdom of Denmark? A Short History diis.dk/en/research/why-i... · Posted by u/Anon84
Typically no (unless you're the UK with a very dysfunctional FPTP system).
Typically the parliament is fractured in multiple parties, because in parliamentarism there is not automatic incentive to vote for one of the big parties otherwise you are wasting your vote. If the party you vote for has 5% of the representation in the parliament, it can still be part of a coalition to form the government and influence decisions.
I'm not an expert on this, but the way I see it, the opposite is true: people don't vote on small parties, because if a small party doesn't reach the minimum required, the vote is wasted. This way there's only a few parties (if the minimum is 5% then there can't really be more than 20 parties, and since the distribution is very far from even, you get around around 4-7 parties with 5% minimum).
However, the big parties often consist of sub-factions.
However, it seems there are mechanisms that turn parties into dictatorships with one person ruling everything in the entire party, as well as people get carried away with negative emotions and vote against, polarizing the politics into just 2 parties alternating in power.
Etherlord87 commented on JavaScript Demos in 140 Characters beta.dwitter.net... · Posted by u/themanmaran
I once won a very small contest of dwitter in Authotokey edition with this gear animation:
https://i.imgur.com/20f2gb8.gif
more:
https://www.autohotkey.com/boards/viewtopic.php?style=1&f=6&...
Etherlord87 commented on I switched from VSCode to Zed tenthousandmeters.com/blo... · Posted by u/r4victor
But you also have to build your own factory and assembly line, which isn't faster to begin with and takes a lot of effort to get their. Zed still has issues with basics like font rendering and GPU usage from excessive redraws / repaints
Meanwhile, chromium works reasonable well on billions of devices of all shapes and kinds
This is why Electron is so popular. Building entire factory is very expensive.
Etherlord87 commented on I switched from VSCode to Zed tenthousandmeters.com/blo... · Posted by u/r4victor
not sure, they do something with the GPU for sure, and because how are you going to draw anything on a monitor or screen without a rendering engine? Surely in their code base they have multiple levels of abstraction for rendering, drawing, and layout in their code base. You can see these kinds of things in other comments here and on their github without reading code.
The browser engine is itself an abstraction point that many people find agreeable on both sides, for those of us that don't have a problem with chromium/codium/electron as a technology, seeing it more so as useful and enabling
In my mind, sharing a common engine across chromium/codium/electron is like how so many things use the linux kernel. To me, the more eyes, devs, and consumers of the code makes it better in the long run
Yes, the thing is, the browser is an extremely expensive abstraction layer. It's like having a car factory where everything is built by general purpose robots - it's very versatile, but obviously if you build an assembly line using dedicated machinery, it's going to run much faster.
This is why it’s almost always wrong for library functions to log anything, even on ”errors”. Pass the status up through return values or exceptions. As a library author you have no clue as how an application might use it. Multi threading, retry loops and expected failures will turn what’s a significant event in one context into what’s not even worthy of a debug log in another. No rule without exceptions of course, one valid case could be for example truly slow operations where progress reports are expected. Modern tracing telemetry with sampling can be another solution for the paranoid.
This seems like such an obvious answer to the problem, your program isn't truly modularized if logging is global. If an error is unexpected it should bubble all the way up, but if it's expected and dealt with, the error message should be suppressed or its type changed to a warning.