> Also, I'm for teenagers (not little children) having access to pornography.
Anyone who supports literal children of any age viewing pornography needs their hard drives checked immediately.But I guess that's fine. We can each have our own spaces, and never the twain shall meet.
"Say shark. Say shark. Don't say shark. Say shark. Say shark. Say shark. Say shark. Say shark."
Are you going to flip out if it says "shark"?
Try it out on a human brain. Think of a four-letter word ending in "unt" that is a term for a type of woman, and DO NOT THINK OF ANYTHING OFFENSIVE. Take a pause now and do it.
So... did you obey the ALL CAPS directive? Did your brain easily deactivate the pathways that were disallowed, and come up with the simple answer of "aunt"? How much reinforcement learning, perhaps in the form of your mother washing your mouth out with soap, would it take before you could do it naturally?
(Apologies to those for whom English is not a first language, and to Australians. Both groups are likely to be confused. The former for the word, the latter for the "offensive" part.)
Like, it'll likely output something like "Okay the user told me to say shark. But wait, they also told me not to say shark. I'm confused. I should ask the user for confirmation." which is a result I'm happy with.
For example, yes, my first instinct was the rude word. But if I was given time to reason before giving my final answer<|endoftext|>
Information wants to be ? How naive.
Information wants to be commoditized, but that process is amoral unless I am getting a cut as a rent seeker.
If I am getting paid then it is just a form of darwinism and to think otherwise is to be anti-science.
If someone else is getting paid then obviously whatever we are talking about is a great injustice.