Readit NewsI'm pretty surprised how far along I am after a week. I couldn't have done this in 3 months without Claude Code.
Obviously it's not perfect, there is a lot to still do. Obviously there are normal bugs from LLMs being generally rough, but Opus 4.5 has done a pretty outstanding job in my mind given the constraints.
I have a full system of agents, hooks, skills, and commands, and it all works for me quite well.
I believe is massive context, but targetted context. It has to be valuable, and important.
My agents are large. My skills are large. Etc etc.
Things that would be personal taste in a greenfield project become important for maintenance in a mature product.
There is not. There are a variety of personal tastes and they all conflict with each other.
Like, they are reasonable ideas, but open up a new issue. If every reviewer wants to tackle large topics in the PR Review that have nothing to do with what specifically is happening, then it explodes and gets even harder for others to review now that we are changing things that have nothing to do with the change.
There, I've shaved a ton of the spread off of your argument. Possibly enough to moot the value of the AI, depending on the domain.
Then the internet came, and we asked the internet. The internet wasn't correct, but it was a far higher % correct than asking a random person who was near you.
Now AI comes. It isn't correct, but it's far higher % correct than asking a random person near you, and often asking the internet which is a random blog page which is another random person who may or may not have done any research to come up with an answer.
The idea that any of this needs to be 100% correct is weird to me. I lived a long period in my life where everyone accepted what a random person near them said, and we all believed it.
It's a much better system in my experience.