If it is too polished, then chances are its AI :)
If it is too polished, then chances are its AI :)
When you operate a community that's hostile to questions that have already been answered, are poorly researched, or are homework, don't be surprised when people start taking those questions elsewhere, and don't be surprised when they start asking their good questions elsewhere, too.
Then I'll look through the changes and decide if it is correct. Sometimes can just run the code to decide if it is correct. Any compilation errors are pasted right back in to the chat in agent mode.
Once the feature is done, commit the changes. Repeat for features.
For the time being, nothing comes close, at least for me.
I use Github copilot and often tend to be frustrated. It messes up old things while making new. I use Claude 4 model in GH CP.
A quick read through seems that the strategies used were fairly rudimentary: a combination of leverage (via options) and going big -- enough to create imbalances that couldn't be offset by other market participants. They did this intraday - presumably closer to the open when price discovery was most important - but also on market close to tilt on-close imbalances.
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/researchers-test-if-thre...
It just doesn't reassure me in the slightest. I don't see how super duper auto complete will lead to AGI. All this hype reminds me of Elon colonizing mars by 2026 and millions or billions of robots by 2030 or something.